 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Aaron Gillies
Subject: Re: Full-length animation [1024 kb, DivX 5.0.3]
Date: 27 May 2003 20:34:38
Message: <3ed4041e$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Worked perfectly for me, but yes ... You don't get
to see a lot at 1Mb over a minute and a half. Crap. I guess that bodes ill
for my idea of doing something similar.
Aaron
"Rick [Kitty5]" <spa### [at] kitty5 com> wrote in message
news:3ed3e2d3$1@news.povray.org...
> Tim Cook wrote:
> > And here's the file.
>
> Similar problem to Aarons DivX, but worse.
>
> Get the first frame and the music, nothing else.
>
>
> --
> Rick
>
> Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.co.uk
> POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
> TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
>
> PGP Public Key
> http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Greg M Johnson
Subject: Re: Full-length animation [1024 kb, DivX 5.0.3]
Date: 27 May 2003 21:51:45
Message: <3ed41631$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Interesting. The overall light level in the room flickers, as one would
expect, but not exactly in sync with the images on the screen. Is it
therefore an unintended artifact?
Nice blob girl.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Greg M Johnson
Subject: Re: Full-length animation [1024 kb, DivX 5.0.3]
Date: 27 May 2003 21:52:09
Message: <3ed41649$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I COULD SEE IT!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tim Cook
Subject: Re: Full-length animation [1024 kb, DivX 5.0.3]
Date: 28 May 2003 03:42:18
Message: <3ed4685a@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Greg M. Johnson wrote:
> Interesting. The overall light level in the room flickers, as one would
> expect, but not exactly in sync with the images on the screen. Is it
> therefore an unintended artifact?
Ehhh not so much unintended as because I was going for speed...using
really cheap radiosity settings.
I had an idea on how to make it in colour, but need an image editing
program that can do some batch image processing beyond just converting
formats. It's a pretty geeky way, too...guess how I'm gonna do it?
--
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook wrote:
> I had an idea on how to make it in colour, but need an image editing
> program that can do some batch image processing beyond just converting
> formats. It's a pretty geeky way, too...guess how I'm gonna do it?
>
Render RGB channeles separately and then merge them?
Maybe XnView can help?
Gleb
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
gk wrote:
> Render RGB channeles separately and then merge them?
Close...I'm making df3 files of each of the channels and
rendering each with emission media of appropriate colour,
with the containing objects lined up.
--
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
<mca### [at] aolcom (S McAvoy)> wrote in message
news:3ed3ecd0.9196403@news.povray.org...
> On Tue, 27 May 2003 23:02:49 +0100, "Rick [Kitty5]" <spa### [at] kitty5com> wrote:
>
> >Tim Cook wrote:
> >> And here's the file.
> >
> >Similar problem to Aarons DivX, but worse.
> >
> >Get the first frame and the music, nothing else.
> >
> Me too,
>
> Regards
> Stephen
<aol>
Me too.
</aol>
Then I noticed that I had DivX version 5.0.2 installed.
I just now upgraded to DivX 5.0.5 (not DivX Pro) and it looks loverly.
Now I can go back and find all the other DivX flix I couldn't see properly before.
--
Thomas Bates
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 31 May 2003 14:14:24 -0600, "Tom Bates" <tho### [at] shawca> wrote:
>Then I noticed that I had DivX version 5.0.2 installed.
>I just now upgraded to DivX 5.0.5 (not DivX Pro) and it looks loverly.
Opps, what a difference an upgrade makes:-}
Nice one Tim. Worth waiting for.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
S McAvoy wrote:
> Opps, what a difference an upgrade makes:-}
> Nice one Tim. Worth waiting for.
I just finished today the full-colour version, want
me to post that? I can probably increase the video
quality if I leave out the audio track.
--
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 31 May 2003 19:27:56 -0400, Tim Cook <z99### [at] bellsouthnet> wrote:
>I just finished today the full-colour version, want
>me to post that? I can probably increase the video
>quality if I leave out the audio track.
Yes, of course :-}
For me you can leave out the audio track :-}
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
