Very nice. I'm surprised to see their feet sliding as I would of
thought that would be a boundary condition or a parameter that other
variable where dependent on.
Tony
ton### [at] xenomechanicscom
> Very nice. I'm surprised to see their feet sliding as I would of ...
You mean "would have." What most people think is "would of" is really just
"would've" which is an abbreviation for "would have." "Would of" is
incorrect grammer. Just FYI.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
> What most people think is "would of" is really just> "would've" which is an abbreviation for "would have." "Would of" is> incorrect grammer. Just FYI.
You mean "contraction." Just FYI. ;)
In article <3d9f7228@news.povray.org>, slm### [at] slimelandcom says...
> > Very nice. I'm surprised to see their feet sliding as I would of ...> > You mean "would have." What most people think is "would of" is really just> "would've" which is an abbreviation for "would have." "Would of" is> incorrect grammer. Just FYI.> > - Slime> [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]>
... and "grammar", not grammer ...
---
Regards, Sander
(still reading some groups!)
com