 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The shadows seem to dissapear,
> watch around the red box.
Maybe it's because the floor simply gets too white? As the shadows
'disappear' the floor seems to be more white than our system can display
(you know the range is clipped between 0-255) and since the shadows are
'light grey' they may turn into 'pure white' as well...?
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mark Hanford
Subject: Re: animation with radiosity (Divx4 461kbu)
Date: 16 Jul 2002 10:16:28
Message: <3d342abc@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I just tried the same animation without radiosity, and it seems fine, so
I assume it must the the radiosity causing the problems.
But it makes them look so pretty! :(
--
Mark Hanford
"Hugo" <hua### [at] post3 teledk> wrote in message
news:3d33449c$1@news.povray.org...
> > The shadows seem to dissapear,
> > watch around the red box.
>
> Maybe it's because the floor simply gets too white? As the shadows
> 'disappear' the floor seems to be more white than our system can
display
> (you know the range is clipped between 0-255) and since the shadows
are
> 'light grey' they may turn into 'pure white' as well...?
>
> Regards,
> Hugo
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I just tried the same animation without radiosity, and it
> seems fine, so I assume it must the the radiosity causing
> the problems.
Still not necessarely. By turning off radiosity the floor might become less
white, thus the shadows are nolonger clipped. This is just a theory. You
could try the animation with radiosity but with less strength of light.
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
