 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rune" <run### [at] mobilixnet dk> wrote in message
news:3ca58c1b$1@news.povray.org...
> Thanks for all the suggestions everyone, but I think I'll just drop adding
> support for wind.
Aw... Oh well, it was fun to think about.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I tried to follow some of your suggestions, and this is the result. I
think
> it's better, but I can still use some more suggestions for improvement. :)
I don't think the grass bends over all at one time, the wind gusts over
moving across.
__________________
RAY
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sir Charles, that's a pretty good description. From what I've learned about flight I
would modify your outlook by describing the
motion as drag, in addition to a force and reaction. In other words, the wind blows
about the blades, and the drag of the blades
creates pockets of varying pressures. The grass blades proceed toward the lower
pressure zones, which move, and thus appear to be
waving in a random manner. Direct gusts appear to overpower the effect of low
pressure, but overall it is the disparity of pressure
that causes the majority of motion. Turbulence must be considered as well...
turbulence from surface perturbations.
You could also say the blades are getting sucked around, rather than blown. :)
Grim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's a shame, because you are onto something here.
Grim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
