 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
As I'm more into animations than still images, it has always bothered me
that my Fast Grass Include File doesn't work in animations (where the camera
move). Oh well...
On a completely unrelated note, what do you think the attached animation is
a test of?
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'fgrass2_test1.mpg' (481 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey, that looks interesting. For far away landscapes
pretty useful, or things that are out of focus. But when
looking closely... Ah, you know.
Good job!
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It definitely works for me- here you have depth and the ability to view from
any angle, and still preserve the illusion of individual, fairly realistic
blades of grass. I'll bet that if you sank the ball or any other object into
the surface, the illusion would still work properly.
Cheers!
Chip Shults
My robotics, space and CGI web page - http://home.cfl.rr.com/aichip
light_source{0#macro k(_)sphere{13*z+i*_.5pigment{agate}finish{phong.3}}#end
1}#macro _(s,i,g)#if(s)k(1)k(-1)_(s-1i+g,g)#end#end _(3x+3*y<2,-2>)_(2x,y)_(
2x-y,x)_(4x*3,-y)_(4<3,1>x)_(2x*6,-y)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Nikias" wrote:
> Hey, that looks interesting. For far away landscapes
> pretty useful, or things that are out of focus.
> But when looking closely... Ah, you know.
This is just the first test of the technique. I hope to get it to look as
good as my existing Fast Grass
(http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/3d/include/fgrass.jpg). It's still not meant for
close-up views of course, but I'd say it can be used for more than just far
away landscapes. As long as the camera is not at grass-level, but at normal
eye-level...
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Sir Charles W. Shults III" wrote:
> It definitely works for me- here you have depth
> and the ability to view from any angle, and still
> preserve the illusion of individual, fairly realistic
> blades of grass.
That's the goal! :)
Don't know if they're fairly realistic yet though...
> I'll bet that if you sank the ball or any other object into
> the surface, the illusion would still work properly.
Hmm, something to try out...
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rune" <run### [at] mobilixnet dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3ca32362@news.povray.org...
> As I'm more into animations than still images, it has always bothered me
> that my Fast Grass Include File doesn't work in animations (where the camera
> move). Oh well...
Nice ... is it the same or a similar technique as the still-life grass ?
I think you'll find a way ... this is a very good start ...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jan Walzer" wrote:
> Nice ... is it the same or a similar technique as
> the still-life grass ?
No, it's a completely different technique.
> I think you'll find a way ... this is a very good start ...
Thanks!
Right now I'm working on adding turbulence to the blades.
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
