POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.animations : Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1) Server Time
2 Nov 2024 11:26:09 EDT (-0400)
  Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1) (Message 1 to 10 of 11)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>
From: Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto
Subject: Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1)
Date: 20 Mar 2002 10:27:51
Message: <3c98aa77@news.povray.org>
It is basically the same animation, but with thicker letters and with a bit
of more background.

I wonder if it could be easily converted to those IE logo bitmap-animations

Again, I appreciate any comments and/or suggestions.

Fernando.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'morph4.m1v.mpg' (314 KB)

From: Gleb
Subject: Re: Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1)
Date: 20 Mar 2002 12:25:36
Message: <3c98c610@news.povray.org>
"Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto" <fgd### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3c98aa77@news.povray.org...
> I wonder if it could be easily converted to those IE logo
bitmap-animations
It seems that the logo is 35 frames of 22x22 pixels in one ,bmp?

> Again, I appreciate any comments and/or suggestions.
Very gracefully.
The only disappointing for me is disjoined letter "O"

Regards,

Gleb


Post a reply to this message

From: Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto
Subject: Re: Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1)
Date: 20 Mar 2002 12:44:04
Message: <3c98ca64@news.povray.org>
"Gleb" <gk1### [at] sotonacuk> wrote in message news:3c98c610@news.povray.org...
> "Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto" <fgd### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:3c98aa77@news.povray.org...
> > I wonder if it could be easily converted to those IE logo
> bitmap-animations
> It seems that the logo is 35 frames of 22x22 pixels in one ,bmp?

Yes, but how can one "concatenate" these frames in one .bmp file? I suppose
there must be some utility out there, but I have not found it.

Fernando.


Post a reply to this message

From: Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto
Subject: Re: Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1)
Date: 20 Mar 2002 12:46:28
Message: <3c98caf4$1@news.povray.org>
> > Again, I appreciate any comments and/or suggestions.
> Very gracefully.
> The only disappointing for me is disjoined letter "O"

Ooops, I forgot to answer the last part of your message! :)

Yes, I also don't like very much the "O" letter, but with 5 control points
that was the best I could get. With one more control point it might have
been much smoother.

Thanks,

Fernando.


Post a reply to this message

From: Mahalis
Subject: Re: Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1)
Date: 20 Mar 2002 16:26:35
Message: <3c98fe8b$1@news.povray.org>
It doesn't have to be 35 frames- any number's fine. I just use 35 cuz..
ehm.. I dunno why I use 35. ;-)
"Gleb" <gk1### [at] sotonacuk> wrote in message news:3c98c610@news.povray.org...
> "Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto" <fgd### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:3c98aa77@news.povray.org...
> > I wonder if it could be easily converted to those IE logo
> bitmap-animations
> It seems that the logo is 35 frames of 22x22 pixels in one ,bmp?
>
> > Again, I appreciate any comments and/or suggestions.
> Very gracefully.
> The only disappointing for me is disjoined letter "O"
>
> Regards,
>
> Gleb
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Mahalis
Subject: Re: Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1)
Date: 20 Mar 2002 16:27:25
Message: <3c98febd$1@news.povray.org>
If you could maybe post the source, I'd be happy to make an IE logo version
4 u.
"Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto" <fgd### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3c98aa77@news.povray.org...
> It is basically the same animation, but with thicker letters and with a
bit
> of more background.
>
> I wonder if it could be easily converted to those IE logo
bitmap-animations
>
> Again, I appreciate any comments and/or suggestions.
>
> Fernando.
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Gleb
Subject: Re: Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1)
Date: 20 Mar 2002 16:58:39
Message: <3c99060f$1@news.povray.org>
"Mahalis" <don### [at] fakeycom> wrote in message
news:3c98fe8b$1@news.povray.org...
> It doesn't have to be 35 frames- any number's fine. I just use 35 cuz..

Thanks for info. Do you know, is it possible to change the background colour
it is placed on in ie also?

Gleb


Post a reply to this message

From: Mahalis
Subject: Re: Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1)
Date: 20 Mar 2002 17:14:57
Message: <3c9909e1$2@news.povray.org>
I don't think so- when I tested it, sometimes (only when it was _not_
navigating) it changed to whatever your backgnd color was and the rest of
the time it didn't.

"Gleb" <gk1### [at] sotonacuk> wrote in message news:3c99060f$1@news.povray.org...
> "Mahalis" <don### [at] fakeycom> wrote in message
> news:3c98fe8b$1@news.povray.org...
> > It doesn't have to be 35 frames- any number's fine. I just use 35 cuz..
>
> Thanks for info. Do you know, is it possible to change the background
colour
> it is placed on in ie also?
>
> Gleb
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto
Subject: Re: Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1)
Date: 20 Mar 2002 17:45:31
Message: <3c99110b@news.povray.org>
Thanks Mahalis, but I would really want to know how did you concatenated all
the .bmp frames in one long .bmp file.

I guess I could program this with a bit of time, but I feel lazy :) I guess
someone else has found an easier way.

Anyway, thanks again for the offer,

Fernando.

"Mahalis" <don### [at] fakeycom> wrote in message
news:3c98febd$1@news.povray.org...
> If you could maybe post the source, I'd be happy to make an IE logo
version
> 4 u.


Post a reply to this message

From: Gleb
Subject: Re: Now, with a bit of more decoration (MPEG1)
Date: 20 Mar 2002 17:56:56
Message: <3c9913b8$1@news.povray.org>
"Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto" <fgd### [at] hotmailcom
<mailto:fgd### [at] hotmailcom>> wrote in message
<news:3c99110b@news.povray.org>...
> Thanks Mahalis, but I would really want to know how did you concatenated
all
> the .bmp frames in one long .bmp file.

Have you looked at pov example for this task in reply for your "Yet another
morph"?
Or you need more convenient way? I think it can be adjusted to any number of
frames.

Regards,
Gleb


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.