|
 |
> Hint: Use a MUCH higher resolution imagemap for the heightfield. Try
> something like 3000x3000 or even higher. Otherwise I like it!
Or try something in between ... 800x800 with smoothed normals (well, the
heightfield smoothing-code might be broken at the moment...) Where is the
lights? :o) I suppose you used fog for this anim.. Good work, it looks
better than the still images.. I mean, the shape is shown better.
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
Hugo wrote:
> Or try something in between ... 800x800 with smoothed normals (well, the
> heightfield smoothing-code might be broken at the moment...) Where is the
> lights? :o) I suppose you used fog for this anim..
The heightfield's 800 x 100, but it looks cheap because I only did the
50' intervals to see what the general thing looked like instead of
finishing all the 10' intervals...that's my next task. I want to turn
on my media, but worry it'll take way too long to render even 1 frame,
let alone 360...
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
