 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have no clue whats wrong, but I have a few ideas.
--
Kevin
http://www.geocities.com/qsquared_1999/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Cloth-DivX.avi.dat' (312 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I have no clue whats wrong, but I have a few ideas.
you need to reduce the dynamite factor somewhat
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I have no clue whats wrong, but I have a few ideas.
What kind of cloth model are you using? Springs? If yes, you're going to
have to use really small time steps and/or less stiff springs.
/ Martin
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002 12:42:42 -0700, "Kevin Loney" <klo### [at] pt2m com>
wrote:
>I have no clue whats wrong, but I have a few ideas.
Typical forward Euler instability. Reduce the integration step, soften
the springs and increase damping, in that order.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If you like the 'rubbery' behaviour, softening the springs is cool. But if
you don't like the rubber sheet effect, you'll have to use VERY SMALL
integration/time steps (especially with forward euler) and very stiff
springs.
--
Apache
http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
apa### [at] yahoocom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 18:35:27 +0100, "Apache"
<apa### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>If you like the 'rubbery' behaviour, softening the springs is cool. But if
>you don't like the rubber sheet effect, you'll have to use VERY SMALL
>integration/time steps (especially with forward euler) and very stiff
>springs.
This is not a solution as the forward Euler becomes unstable with the
number of steps, too. I've had a perfectly settled system (i.e. in
static balance) explode in just a few dozen iterations. You have to
use a converging method, and the forward Euler is not one.
Sorry to be the bringer of bad news... please spare me :)
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
