 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I lowered the elasticity of the balls and increased their number.
I'm thinking about using a blob (and much more particles) next time, but you
can bet it will be very slow.
Comments, criticisms, suggestions?
--
Jonathan.
Home: http://digilander.iol.it/jrgpov
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'FILL.MPG' (662 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
me likes ....
and now make it shake ...
--
Jan Walzer <jan### [at] lzer net>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jan Walzer wrote:
> me likes ....
I'm glad you do.
> and now make it shake ...
Thanks for the suggestion... I will :)
--
Jonathan.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"JRG" wrote:
> I lowered the elasticity of the balls and increased their number.
The realism of the simulation is outstanding!
But it looks unnatural to have the balls emitted from a single point. Try to
emit them from an area instead and then let them fall down more straight
(initials directions should have less randomness).
Keep up the good work! :)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Nov 5)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
These animations look great JRG. Maybe you could try varying the colour of the
balls as they drop, to form coloured layers as the container fills up. Was there
a reason you didn't fill the container? Does the render time balloon as more
particles are checked for collisions?
MJL
--
light_source{12*(y-z)rgb 2fade_distance 9fade_power 2area_light x,z,5,5}#macro A
(H,B,R,T)prism{0,1H+4,0u*9,9v*9,0#local I=1;#while(I<H)#local V=asc(substr(B,I,1
))-33;<div(V,10)mod(V,10)>#local I=I+1;#end pigment{red 1}rotate-<90,R>translate
-T}#end A(16"/.@VZno=<PLA89/"0,5*x)A(14",6;MWmhryXN3,"60<15,0,8>)camera{location
25*(y-z)look_at 0}A(8"6hiAG=6"-60,-10*x)box{-99(x+z)*99 pigment{rgb 1}} // MJL
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rune wrote:
> The realism of the simulation is outstanding!
Thanks!
> But it looks unnatural to have the balls emitted from a single point. Try
to
> emit them from an area instead and then let them fall down more straight
> (initials directions should have less randomness).
You're right. Maybe if the balls were shot by a cannon of some sort?...
> Keep up the good work! :)
>
> Rune
> --
> 3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
> Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Nov 5)
> POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
> POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Practically AWESOME....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mark James Lewin wrote:
> These animations look great JRG.
Oh, thank you.
>Maybe you could try varying the colour of the
> balls as they drop, to form coloured layers as the container fills up. Was
there
> a reason you didn't fill the container? Does the render time balloon as
more
> particles are checked for collisions?
The animation would have been far too big to be posted here... but yes,
parsing time increases drastically as the number of particles grows :( The
last frames took about 9-10 seconds to parse (and a few seconds to trace),
but if more balls were involved I bet that time would grow more than
exponentially!
--
Jonathan.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I love this animation! I agree with Rune; the realism is just outstanding.
Great job, JRG.
-Law
JRG wrote:
> I lowered the elasticity of the balls and increased their number.
> I'm thinking about using a blob (and much more particles) next time, but you
> can bet it will be very slow.
>
> Comments, criticisms, suggestions?
>
> --
> Jonathan.
>
> Home: http://digilander.iol.it/jrgpov
>
> Name: FILL.MPG
> FILL.MPG Type: Mplayer2 File (video/mpeg)
> Encoding: x-uuencode
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank you Greg.
"Greg M. Johnson" <"gregj56590[:-0]"@aol.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3C0D40FB.F171E5CE@aol.com...
> Practically AWESOME....
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks!
"Lawrence Winstead" <law### [at] duratechindustriesnet> ha scritto
nel messaggio news:3C0### [at] duratechindustriesnet...
> I love this animation! I agree with Rune; the realism is just
outstanding.
> Great job, JRG.
>
> -Law
>
> JRG wrote:
>
> > I lowered the elasticity of the balls and increased their number.
> > I'm thinking about using a blob (and much more particles) next time, but
you
> > can bet it will be very slow.
> >
> > Comments, criticisms, suggestions?
> >
> > --
> > Jonathan.
> >
> > Home: http://digilander.iol.it/jrgpov
> >
> > Name: FILL.MPG
> > FILL.MPG Type: Mplayer2 File (video/mpeg)
> > Encoding: x-uuencode
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Absolutely stunning! Just about everybody has beaten me to achieving such an
animation using POV code only, and I'm still non the wiser as how to
accomplish it. As this is by far the best POV particle interaction animation
I've seen, I would be extremely grateful if I could see your code, to try to
understand how to program such a system myself.
Andy Cocker
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3c0d0a00@news.povray.org...
> I lowered the elasticity of the balls and increased their number.
> I'm thinking about using a blob (and much more particles) next time, but
you
> can bet it will be very slow.
>
> Comments, criticisms, suggestions?
>
> --
> Jonathan.
>
> Home: http://digilander.iol.it/jrgpov
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
wow!!
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's one of the most realistic animations I've ever seen ! Possible
expansion - different sizes of balls all together, some bog, some tiny.
JRG wrote:
>
> I lowered the elasticity of the balls and increased their number.
> I'm thinking about using a blob (and much more particles) next time, but you
> can bet it will be very slow.
>
> Comments, criticisms, suggestions?
>
> --
> Jonathan.
>
> Home: http://digilander.iol.it/jrgpov
>
> Name: FILL.MPG
> FILL.MPG Type: Mplayer2 File (video/mpeg)
> Encoding: x-uuencode
--
Oliver Wood
University Of Durham
http://www.dur.ac.uk/o.e.wood/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
JRG wrote:
>
> but if more balls were involved I bet that time would grow more than
> exponentially!
More than exponentially is not possible.
Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > but if more balls were involved I bet that time would grow more
than
> > exponentially!
>
> More than exponentially is not possible.
>
> Markus
what about "n!" ? (don't know the english word - you know, it's
1*2*...*(n-1)*n)
I'm not sure at all, but lim(2^n/n!) = 0 if n goes to infinity?
cukk
f'up to off-topic (is that okay?...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, please show us the code.
I want to see how the hole container fills with balls.
PLEASE!!!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
