|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | Not for ordinary solid primitives, like a text object, for instance, but
who cares! :)
http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/6567/thetain3d.gif
 Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | LOL  This is good.
Thomas
 Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | Le 09/05/2013 22:07, Subclick nous fit lire :
> Not for ordinary solid primitives, like a text object, for instance, but
> who cares! :)
> 
> http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/6567/thetain3d.gif
> 
Nice, the mesh seems to show a bit.
 Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | What now?
 Post a reply to this message
 Attachments:
 Download 'thetain3d.gif' (878 KB)
Download 'utf-8' (1 KB)
 
 
 Preview of image 'thetain3d.gif'
  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | On 5/25/2021 9:40 AM, Subclick wrote:
> 
> What now?
> 
> 
> 
> Whatever you notice, it’s not the mesh, because there’s no mesh.
> 
Whatever it is, it looks sweet and tasty!
Mike
 Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | Le 2021-05-25 à 09:40, Subclick a écrit :
> 
> What now?
> 
> 
> 
> Whatever you notice, it’s not the mesh, because there’s no mesh.
> 
Nice.
Let me guess... An isosurface with cyclical perturbation.
 Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | On 5/25/2021 9:40 AM, Subclick wrote:
> 
> What now?
> 
> 
> 
> Whatever you notice, it’s not the mesh, because there’s no mesh.
> 
The faceted texture makes it look like a mesh. I was fooled.
Mike
 Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | Subclick <no### [at] sp am> wrote:
> What now?
Make it out of jello?  :D
And also know that related to Jello, sin (b) / tan (b) = . . . ? Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | Alain Martel <kua### [at] videotron ca> writes:
> Let me guess... An isosurface with cyclical perturbation.
I wish!  I couldn’t come up with a way to get rid of the infinite
gradient of the ‘object’ pattern on the object’s boundary without
ruining it in the process, so I made do with a ridiculous number of thin
slices of the object rotated appropriately. Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | Subclick <no### [at] sp am> wrote:
> Alain Martel <kua### [at] videotron  ca> writes:
>
> > Let me guess... An isosurface with cyclical perturbation.
>
> ruining it in the process, so I made do with a ridiculous number of thin
> slices of the object rotated appropriately.
Because it's a giant mess.  You can do it, and it will be a bit slow, but here's
a link for you:
http://news.povray.org/web.5ebedadaa032ea3dfb0b41570%40news.povray.org Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |