"Dave Blandston" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> "jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Also this particular song does not have a regular, constant beat - it changes
> continually. It took well over an hour, probably closer to two hours just to get
> to the 44 second mark but it is possible. I wish I could use your script but I
> think it would be impossible to get accurate results, at least for this song.
would need .. nimble fingers.
> If you haven't heard it check it out and you'll see what I mean...
> Plus listening to it will make your day better!
it did. :-)
I often find cover versions the equal of, or better than, the originals, eg:
Post a reply to this message