POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : vanilla animation Server Time
25 Dec 2024 22:48:17 EST (-0500)
  vanilla animation (Message 1 to 5 of 5)  
From: Anthony D  Baye
Subject: vanilla animation
Date: 2 Dec 2008 12:45:01
Message: <web.493573a21ccd215925d473160@news.povray.org>
I'm having trouble initializing a clocked animation using the command-line box
in the beta version, it keeps telling me I have an invalid command line but the
arguments are the same as I always use.  Did something change?

command-line: +FS24, +W640, +H480, +K1.0, +KFF180

The same commands work in 3.6 just fine.

I don't really know anything about .ini files, so I tend to use the command box
for such things.

A.D.B.


Post a reply to this message

From: Chambers
Subject: Re: vanilla animation
Date: 2 Dec 2008 23:03:44
Message: <0B48159693894107B85FCA674802C1DE@HomePC>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony D. Baye [mailto:Sha### [at] spamnomorehotmailcom]
> command-line: +FS24, +W640, +H480, +K1.0, +KFF180

The important ones here aree:
+K1.0 Sets the clock to 1.0
+KFF180 Sets the final frame to 180.

Now, what exactly did you want to do?  I would recommend something like
these (just guessing, of course):
+KI0 +KF1 +KFI1 +KFF180
+KI1 +KF180 +KFI0 +KFF180

The first interpolates the clock value from 0 to 1, with 180 frames.
The second interpolates from 1 to 180, such that the clock value is
identical to the frame number (note that POV doesn't {or didn't -
perhaps it's been added?} accept a frame value of 0).

...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: vanilla animation
Date: 3 Dec 2008 08:16:02
Message: <49368692@news.povray.org>
Chambers wrote:
> (note that POV doesn't {or didn't -
> perhaps it's been added?} accept a frame value of 0).

Huh? I have always used +kfi0 with no problem...


Post a reply to this message

From: Chambers
Subject: Re: vanilla animation
Date: 3 Dec 2008 10:22:30
Message: <CF213ACC7AE247F0A975E54C6B4C79A1@HomePC>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolas Alvarez [mailto:nic### [at] gmailcom]
> Huh? I have always used +kfi0 with no problem...

And I've used it several times, too.  But I recall a bug being found a
while back, where the cause was determined to be a frame value of 0
which, it turned out, was unsupported (thus causing the bug).  I don't
know if they ever fixed that or not.

...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Anthony D  Baye
Subject: Re: vanilla animation
Date: 3 Dec 2008 13:20:01
Message: <web.4936cd93defc8557d2ccd6da0@news.povray.org>
I figured it out, the parser no longer accepts comma-separated arguments, which
makes sense...

The next thing on my list is: Have the additional animation variables been
removed?  (clock_delta, initial_clock, final_clock)...

They no longer highlight as keywords in the beta.

A.D.B.

"Anthony D. Baye" <Sha### [at] spamnomorehotmailcom> wrote:
> I'm having trouble initializing a clocked animation using the command-line box
> in the beta version, it keeps telling me I have an invalid command line but the
> arguments are the same as I always use.  Did something change?
>
> command-line: +FS24, +W640, +H480, +K1.0, +KFF180
>
> The same commands work in 3.6 just fine.
>
> I don't really know anything about .ini files, so I tend to use the command box
> for such things.
>
> A.D.B.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.