"Blackfeather" <jam### [at] blackfeathermediacom> wrote:
> Thanks in advance for recommending SMPOV, but I can't go without radiosity.

My noobiness shines through regardless.  Aparantly, even if I COULD get a
copy of the 3.7 beta 22, I still wouldn't be able to use radiosity.  Please
disregard this entire 'unecessary' thread, and don't frown upon my future
posts...

- James

(With regard to my project, I ended up just running 5 instances of 3.6.1c on
three computers.  Each image took over 27 hours, but came out just
beautiful.  Thanks for a great product!  I look foreward to the day I can
put all four cores to work.)

Post a reply to this message

"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in message 
news:471302c1$1@news.povray.org...
> Warp wrote:
>>   Somehow the word "hypocrisy" comes to mind.
>
> ROFL
>
> Welcome to the club, Warp! There will always be a few people who 
> do not
> appreciate a direct response. Now that I don't post so often for 
> exactly the
> same reason, some people had to find someone else to hate - that 
> seems to be
> you, so congratulations :-P
>
> Thorsten

for what it is worth ...

Over the years I gace appreciated your "direct responses".
Something about objectiveness, not indulging in time
wasting and accuracy.

Illegitimi Non Carborundum
.

Post a reply to this message

"Blackfeather" <jam### [at] blackfeathermediacom> wrote in message 
news:web.4714d86dc43a5a194d6cf4fa0@news.povray.org...
> "Blackfeather" <jam### [at] blackfeathermediacom> wrote:
>> Thanks in advance for recommending SMPOV, but I can't go without 
>> radiosity.
>
> My noobiness shines through regardless.  Aparantly, even if I COULD get a
> copy of the 3.7 beta 22, I still wouldn't be able to use radiosity. 
> Please
> disregard this entire 'unecessary' thread, and don't frown upon my future
> posts...
>
> - James
>
> (With regard to my project, I ended up just running 5 instances of 3.6.1c 
> on
> three computers.  Each image took over 27 hours, but came out just
> beautiful.  Thanks for a great product!  I look foreward to the day I can
> put all four cores to work.)

Glad you managed a workaround. Sorry you walked in during a bit of a flame 
war and welcome :)

--Simon

Post a reply to this message

Blackfeather wrote:
> I know I'm going to get flamed or ignored for this, but what are the chances
> of me downloading the expired 3.7 beta 22?  I was hoping to do some
> multi-core rendering this weekend.  It kills me to see only 25% CPU usage
> for a 20 hour rendering!  Thanks in advance for recommending SMPOV, but I
> can't go without radiosity.
> 
> I apologize for asking, but I missed the expiry date by only a few days, and
> I absolutely promise not to post any bug reports...

I'll move them back to the old location and place a warning up.

-- Chris

Post a reply to this message

Chris Cason <del### [at] deletethistoopovrayorg> wrote:
> I'll move them back to the old location and place a warning up.

Thank you thank you thank you...


"Simon" <povray@*NOSPAM*SOWare.co.uk> wrote:
> Glad you managed a workaround. Sorry you walked in during a bit of a flame
> war and welcome :)

thanks.  I don't mind so much.  I'm not new to forums, just new to this one.
 The flaming actually helps me see right off the bat who NOT to piss off.

- James

Post a reply to this message