On 2025-12-25 05:58 (-4), jr wrote:
> 
> unsure if it is "in the spirit", but a "dedicated" font (preferred TTF) default,
> for "post installation" ?

I don't know what you mean by "dedicated."  In current text{} syntax, a
font is always specified, so there is no default font.

> given the name and the purpose[*] of the file, I tried using 'include_header' to
> load it.  it seems that for the system-wide 'povray.ini' that keyword won't
> work.  for my personal file (~/.povray/3.8.povray.ini) I needed to add a
> '#version version;' line to 'defaults.inc', before the guard, to avoid the 'as
> of version 3.7' error message.
> 
> [*] I am looking at it not as the first include in other include files but as an
> "always load", ideally.

I was thinking of this sort of construction in the scene description file:

---%<-----%<-----%<-----%<---[BEGIN CODE]---%<-----%<-----%<-----%<---
#declare Default_Ambient = rgb 0.05;
#declare Default_Diffuse = 0.8;
#declare Default_Gamma = 1.8; // I wouldn't, but some might ;)

#default
{ finish
  { ambient Defaults_Ambient
    diffuse Defaults_Diffuse
  }
}
global_settings { assumed_gamma Defaults_Gamma }

#include "textures.inc"
#include "metals.inc"
#include "golds.inc"
#include "androidrobot.inc"
--->%----->%----->%----->%----[END CODE]---->%----->%----->%----->%---

This would work with or without an "always load"; the other include
files could just test for the identifiers in default.inc, and if they're
not defined, the include file could just assume the POV-Ray defaults.

But I had the thought that those #default and assumed_gamma statements
look kinda redundant.  It would be cleaner if those statements were
incorporated into defaults.inc; but with that scheme, an "always load"
wouldn't work, because the scene file would not have the chance to
#declare the default identifiers in advance.

As for '#version version;', the fundamental problem I have with this
construct is that it leaves no indication which version of POV-Ray the
scene file or include file is intended for.

Post a reply to this message

Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> On 2025-12-25 05:58 (-4), jr wrote:
> >
> > unsure if it is "in the spirit", but a "dedicated" font (preferred TTF) default,
> > for "post installation" ?
>
> I don't know what you mean by "dedicated."  In current text{} syntax, a
> font is always specified, so there is no default font.

I were to interpret this,  I would say that after installing POV-Ray, we might
all agree to use Lucid_sans_unicode.ttf as our default font, and then the
default.inc file would run a check to see if that font existed, and if not, then
default to one of the inbuilt fonts.  Then default_font could be used as an
identifier in EVERY text {} object as the default, rather than specifying a
specific font filename.
Then if the default were changed, it could be done in that one place in the
default.inc file.


> I was thinking of this sort of construction in the scene description file:
>
> ---%<-----%<-----%<-----%<---[BEGIN CODE]---%<-----%<-----%<-----%<---
> #declare Default_Ambient = rgb 0.05;
> #declare Default_Diffuse = 0.8;
> #declare Default_Gamma = 1.8; // I wouldn't, but some might ;)
>
> #default
> { finish
>   { ambient Defaults_Ambient // Default_Ambient (no s)
>     diffuse Defaults_Diffuse // Default_Diffuse (no s)
>   }
> }
> global_settings { assumed_gamma Defaults_Gamma } // Default_Gamma (no s)
>
> #include "textures.inc"
> #include "metals.inc"
> #include "golds.inc"
> #include "androidrobot.inc"
> --->%----->%----->%----->%----[END CODE]---->%----->%----->%----->%---
>
> This would work with or without an "always load"; the other include
> files could just test for the identifiers in default.inc, and if they're
> not defined, the include file could just assume the POV-Ray defaults.
>
> But I had the thought that those #default and assumed_gamma statements
> look kinda redundant.  It would be cleaner if those statements were
> incorporated into defaults.inc; but with that scheme, an "always load"
> wouldn't work, because the scene file would not have the chance to
> #declare the default identifiers in advance.


The always-load would just declare those identifiers.
Any declarations in the scene would overwrite them.
What about Default_Ambient () as a macro, saving the typing of #declare, and it
could even call Default_Finish () to redeclare the default.
you could do the same with diffuse and gamma

> As for '#version version;', the fundamental problem I have with this
> construct is that it leaves no indication which version of POV-Ray the
> scene file or include file is intended for.

Well, there are comments,
but also, you could write a Version () macro that took two arguments, the
current version, and the intended version, and then you'd have a wide latitude
for what happens after that.

In fact, I'm thinking that a lot of the directives could be recast as
(capitalized) macros that do a lot of sanity checking and special handling.  As
a macro, we could internally document the use of the directive and guard against
any recurrent newbie (ab)uses.

It would be a great way to embed all of our accumulated knowledge into a
parallel system of commands that would be didactic/pedagogical,
self-documenting, and only a bit slower for most small, static scenes.

- BE

Post a reply to this message

hi,

Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> On 2025-12-25 05:58 (-4), jr wrote:
> > unsure if it is "in the spirit", but a "dedicated" font (preferred TTF) default,
> > for "post installation" ?
> I don't know what you mean by "dedicated."  In current text{} syntax, a
> font is always specified, so there is no default font.

in context I mean(t):
#declare Defaults_Font = "timrom.ttf";

to allow use in those 'text{}'s.


> > [*] I am looking at it not as the first include in other include files but as an
> > "always load", ideally.
> I was thinking of this sort of construction in the scene description file:
>
> ---%<-----%<-----%<-----%<---[BEGIN CODE]---%<-----%<-----%<-----%<---
> #declare Default_Ambient = rgb 0.05;

won't fly.  '#version' has to be first.


> ...
> As for '#version version;', the fundamental problem I have with this
> construct is that it leaves no indication which version of POV-Ray the
> scene file or include file is intended for.

in the 'defaults.inc' example that line comes before the guard, needed to avoid
an error.  the version required by the code (for includes) is inside the guard.
for scene files (I guess) there'd be no difference.


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message

hi,

"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> ...
> In fact, I'm thinking that a lot of the directives could be recast as
> (capitalized) macros that do a lot of sanity checking and special handling.  As
> a macro, we could internally document the use of the directive and guard against
> any recurrent newbie (ab)uses.
>
> It would be a great way to embed all of our accumulated knowledge into a
> parallel system of commands that would be didactic/pedagogical,
> self-documenting, and only a bit slower for most small, static scenes.

v nice idea.  "self-documenting" - exactly, I like that.


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message

On 2026-01-06 13:53 (-4), jr wrote:
> Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>> On 2025-12-25 05:58 (-4), jr wrote:
>>> unsure if it is "in the spirit", but a "dedicated" font (preferred TTF) default,
>>> for "post installation" ?
>> I don't know what you mean by "dedicated."  In current text{} syntax, a
>> font is always specified, so there is no default font.
> 
> in context I mean(t):
> #declare Defaults_Font = "timrom.ttf";
> 
> to allow use in those 'text{}'s.

I dunno.  That seems superfluous to me.

>> ---%<-----%<-----%<-----%<---[BEGIN CODE]---%<-----%<-----%<-----%<---
>> #declare Default_Ambient = rgb 0.05;
> 
> won't fly.  '#version' has to be first.

Granted.  I should have started that scene file excerpt with '#version
3.8;'.

Post a reply to this message

I wrote out a generic implementation for an always-included set of files.

A few things not yet implemented due to not having the code readily available.

Just a proof-of-concept, I'm sure that some things might be best loaded from
other dedicated include files, (best would be inbuilt as source), though I'm
still trying to work out a good way to have a "monolithic include file" where
only the desired parts will actually be loaded/implemented.

I think that a calculation for minimum visible size/radius would be a good
addition, as would an always-face-the-camera macro.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'defaults_be.inc.txt' (6 KB)

hi,

Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> ...
> > #declare Defaults_Font = "timrom.ttf";
> ...
> I dunno.  That seems superfluous to me.

:-)


> >> ---%<-----%<-----%<-----%<---[BEGIN CODE]---%<-----%<-----%<-----%<---
> >> #declare Default_Ambient = rgb 0.05;
> >
> > won't fly.  '#version' has to be first.
>
> Granted.  I should have started that scene file excerpt with '#version
> 3.8;'.

right, I used '#version version' as per "recommendation", see last sentence(s)
on the page:
<https://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Numeric_Expressions#Built-in_Variables>


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message

On 2026-01-08 02:57 (-4), jr wrote:
> 
> right, I used '#version version' as per "recommendation", see last sentence(s)
> on the page:
> <https://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Numeric_Expressions#Built-in_Variables>

I read that paragraph a long time ago, and it didn't make sense to me.
Now I'm reading it over and over, and I still can't figure out what it
means, or why I should use that construct.

Post a reply to this message

Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> On 2026-01-08 02:57 (-4), jr wrote:
> >
> > right, I used '#version version' as per "recommendation", see last sentence(s)
> > on the page:
> > <https://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Numeric_Expressions#Built-in_Variables>
>
> I read that paragraph a long time ago, and it didn't make sense to me.
> Now I'm reading it over and over, and I still can't figure out what it
> means, or why I should use that construct.

I will agree that that paragraph is poorly phrased.
It may even have typos.

In any event, I think that the general idea is to just be able to declare the
version to be whatever software version is used. (automatically)
You can get rid of the warning/error using boilerplate and without having to
know what version is being used.

Then you can do whatever manual versioning stuff afterwards.

At least that seems to be the intent. (?)

- BE

Post a reply to this message

hi,

"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> > On 2026-01-08 02:57 (-4), jr wrote:
> > > right, I used '#version version' as per "recommendation", ...
> > I read that paragraph a long time ago, and it didn't make sense to me.
> > Now I'm reading it over and over, and I still can't figure out what it
> > means, or why I should use that construct.
>
> I will agree that that paragraph is poorly phrased.
> It may even have typos.

in which case, would (either of) you mind sending (or posting) a suggestion for
a re-worded, improved paragraph ?


> In any event, I think that the general idea is to just be able to declare the
> version to be whatever software version is used. (automatically)
> You can get rid of the warning/error using boilerplate and without having to
> know what version is being used.
> Then you can do whatever manual versioning stuff afterwards.
> At least that seems to be the intent. (?)


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message