|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le_Forgeron <jgr### [at] freefr> wrote:
> Even a bigger hammer: if I use memset with a value of 0xFF (instead of 0), I get a
100% background image.
> Reliably.
That did the trick.
Found the culprit and about to submit a fix any moment now.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ThH <no.spam@address> wrote:
> I don't see a bicubic_patch 8[
Please test the newest master.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 05/03/2016 17:37, clipka a écrit :
> ThH <no.spam@address> wrote:
>> I don't see a bicubic_patch 8[
>
> Please test the newest master.
>
POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8508492.unofficial seems ok, at least for valgrind (but I was only
getting small artefacts, randomly)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Good to be back on news.povray.org:119 !
Am 05.03.2016 um 17:37 schrieb clipka:
> Please test the newest master.
Bezier is fine now. Thanks clipka :))
--
Thorsten aka ThH
povray --V
POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8508492.unofficial
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 06.03.2016 um 09:18 schrieb Le_Forgeron:
> Le 05/03/2016 17:37, clipka a écrit :
>> ThH <no.spam@address> wrote:
>>> I don't see a bicubic_patch 8[
>>
>> Please test the newest master.
>
> POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8508492.unofficial seems ok, at least for valgrind (but I was
only getting small artefacts, randomly)
Does it also affect the Leak Summary?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 06.03.2016 um 09:20 schrieb ThH:
> Bezier is fine now. Thanks clipka :))
bezier.pov shows some artefacts.
flatness seems to have some influence on this. Lower flatness, less/no
artefacts.
Just to let you know ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 06/03/2016 09:25, clipka a écrit :
> Am 06.03.2016 um 09:18 schrieb Le_Forgeron:
>> Le 05/03/2016 17:37, clipka a écrit :
>>> ThH <no.spam@address> wrote:
>>>> I don't see a bicubic_patch 8[
>>>
>>> Please test the newest master.
>>
>> POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8508492.unofficial seems ok, at least for valgrind (but I was
only getting small artefacts, randomly)
>
> Does it also affect the Leak Summary?
>
If you want more details about the leak, attached file was done with:
valgrind --log-file=memcheckpovray2.txt --track-origins=yes --leak-check=full dmpovray
bezier.pov
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'memcheckpovray2.txt' (24 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 06.03.2016 um 09:32 schrieb ThH:
> bezier.pov shows some artefacts.
>
> flatness seems to have some influence on this. Lower flatness, less/no
> artefacts.
Thin lines?
They're normal, and the flatness parameter is indeed the setting to
counteract them.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 06/03/2016 09:42, Le_Forgeron a écrit :
> Le 06/03/2016 09:25, clipka a écrit :
>> Am 06.03.2016 um 09:18 schrieb Le_Forgeron:
>>> Le 05/03/2016 17:37, clipka a écrit :
>>>> ThH <no.spam@address> wrote:
>>>>> I don't see a bicubic_patch 8[
>>>>
>>>> Please test the newest master.
>>>
>>> POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8508492.unofficial seems ok, at least for valgrind (but I was
only getting small artefacts, randomly)
>>
>> Does it also affect the Leak Summary?
>>
> If you want more details about the leak, attached file was done with:
>
> valgrind --log-file=memcheckpovray2.txt --track-origins=yes --leak-check=full
dmpovray bezier.pov
>
And to compare with the stable head, another attached file.
It was less leaking before :-)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'memcheckpovray.txt' (6 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 06.03.2016 um 09:46 schrieb clipka:
> Thin lines?
Yes.
> They're normal, and the flatness parameter is indeed the setting to
> counteract them.
Looked up the docs. That's why I tried this ;)
To be honest... I've never used bicubic_patch before.
For me the image is fine :)
The 'rest' is yours.
Only citing valgrind here: Go fix your program! ;))
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |