POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : focal blur change? Server Time
23 Dec 2024 05:08:25 EST (-0500)
  focal blur change? (Message 1 to 6 of 6)  
From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: focal blur change?
Date: 11 May 2010 08:39:13
Message: <4be94ff1$1@news.povray.org>
Playing around with recent beta and noticed a focal blur change ... well
not necessarily a behavior change, maybe just a messages stream change.

Didn't v3.6 used to report standard AA turned off if focal blur was
switched on? Now I see in the messages stream that my ini AA settings
are being echoed (honored?) sans the "old" message (AA off) ... focal
blur STILL appears to be working.

I see several mentions for fixed focal blur this and that, but no
specifics in: http://www.povray.org/beta/changes.txt

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: focal blur change?
Date: 11 May 2010 09:26:24
Message: <4be95b00@news.povray.org>
Jim Holsenback <jho### [at] povrayorg> wrote:
> Playing around with recent beta and noticed a focal blur change ... well
> not necessarily a behavior change, maybe just a messages stream change.

> Didn't v3.6 used to report standard AA turned off if focal blur was
> switched on? Now I see in the messages stream that my ini AA settings
> are being echoed (honored?) sans the "old" message (AA off) ... focal
> blur STILL appears to be working.

  POV-Ray 3.7 will calculate focal blur *and* antialiasing (in other words,
if you use both, your image will be different than when using focal blur
only). I don't remember when this change was made, but it was pretty early
in the development cycle.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: focal blur change?
Date: 11 May 2010 09:58:44
Message: <4be96294$1@news.povray.org>
On 05/11/2010 10:26 AM, Warp wrote:
>   POV-Ray 3.7 will calculate focal blur *and* antialiasing (in other words,
> if you use both, your image will be different than when using focal blur
> only). I don't remember when this change was made, but it was pretty early
> in the development cycle.
> 

Thanks for the clarification .... it sounds like I ought to make note of
that here:
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Tutorial_Section_2.2#Using_Focal_Blur

in the final paragraph ... agreed?

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Kenneth
Subject: Re: focal blur change?
Date: 11 May 2010 14:45:01
Message: <web.4be9a4e349696a26ae92d9930@news.povray.org>
Jim Holsenback <jho### [at] povrayorg> wrote:

> Thanks for the clarification .... it sounds like I ought to make note of
> that here:
> http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Tutorial_Section_2.2#Using_Focal_Blur
>
> in the final paragraph ... agreed?
>

Yes. Although, the "We need not specify anti-aliasing because..." part should be
kept, for v3.6 users (at least until 3.7 comes out.)

BTW, I would suggest that the focal-blur section be farther down in the "Using
the camera" documentation--right now, it's the first topic there, even before
the 'basics' of the POV coordinate system, etc. Putting it later would seem more
logical to me, as blur is a more 'advanced' topic.

Ken


Post a reply to this message

From: Kenneth
Subject: Re: focal blur change?
Date: 11 May 2010 15:05:01
Message: <web.4be9a92549696a26ae92d9930@news.povray.org>
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:

> BTW, I would suggest that the focal-blur section be farther down in the "Using
> the camera" documentation--right now, it's the first topic there, even before
> the 'basics' of the POV coordinate system, etc. Putting it later would seem more
> logical to me, as blur is a more 'advanced' topic.
>

Sorry, I didn't realize that 'focal blur' was the *only* wiki section currently
included in "Using the camera."

Ken
---with egg on face--


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: focal blur change?
Date: 11 May 2010 16:43:00
Message: <4be9c154$1@news.povray.org>
On 05/11/2010 03:59 PM, Kenneth wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't realize that 'focal blur' was the *only* wiki section currently
> included in "Using the camera."

yes ... it DOES seem out of place there all by it's lonesome :-(


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.