 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm working on getting a new beta out (this time with some real fixes).
Please, as usual, be patient with the delay ... :[
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Personally, I find it keeps me much more interested to have to play around
with my system clock to get POVRay Beta to run - If it weren't for the
jarring "Pre-Release Expired" messagebox, I would've got bored months ago :D
On a serious note, I'm assuming this si to stop the dev tema being flooded
with bug reports for bugs which have already been adressed. May I suggest
instead of closing outright, make the messagebox a "Continue and agree not
to complain? [Y/N]"
Not sure what happens on Linux when it's expired so can't really comment -
maybe a C-L switch?
Either way, thanks for making sure there's always somethign to work with.
Regards,
Simon
"Chris Cason" <del### [at] deletethistoo povrayorg> wrote in
message news:46ca03c8$1@news.povray.org...
> I'm working on getting a new beta out (this time with some real fixes).
> Please, as usual, be patient with the delay ... :[
>
> -- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simon wrote:
> On a serious note, I'm assuming this si to stop the dev tema being flooded
> with bug reports for bugs which have already been adressed. May I suggest
> instead of closing outright, make the messagebox a "Continue and agree not
> to complain? [Y/N]"
actually come to think of it, that's not such a bad idea ...
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Simon" <povray@*NOSPAM*SOWare.co.uk> schreef in bericht
news:46cad7a0$1@news.povray.org...
>
> On a serious note, I'm assuming this si to stop the dev tema being flooded
> with bug reports for bugs which have already been adressed. May I suggest
> instead of closing outright, make the messagebox a "Continue and agree not
> to complain? [Y/N]"
LOL! I like that!
>
> Either way, thanks for making sure there's always somethign to work with.
I wholeheartedly join the chorus here!! :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> "Simon" <povray@*NOSPAM*SOWare.co.uk> schreef in bericht
> news:46cad7a0$1@news.povray.org...
> >
> > On a serious note, I'm assuming this si to stop the dev tema being flooded
> > with bug reports for bugs which have already been adressed. May I suggest
> > instead of closing outright, make the messagebox a "Continue and agree not
> > to complain? [Y/N]"
>
> LOL! I like that!
>
> >
> > Either way, thanks for making sure there's always somethign to work with.
>
> I wholeheartedly join the chorus here!! :-)
Yes, me too. I've only just started using the beta, to render some images at
poster sizes, and it's very impressive. The clock solution is not a problem
(I don't use that machine for anything else!) but I too like the idea of a
disclaimer.
Keep up the good work, it's definitely appreciated. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill Pragnell wrote:
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
>> "Simon" <povray@*NOSPAM*SOWare.co.uk> schreef in bericht
>> news:46cad7a0$1@news.povray.org...
>>> On a serious note, I'm assuming this si to stop the dev tema being flooded
>>> with bug reports for bugs which have already been adressed. May I suggest
>>> instead of closing outright, make the messagebox a "Continue and agree not
>>> to complain? [Y/N]"
>> LOL! I like that!
>>
>>> Either way, thanks for making sure there's always somethign to work with.
>> I wholeheartedly join the chorus here!! :-)
>
> Yes, me too. I've only just started using the beta, to render some images at
> poster sizes, and it's very impressive. The clock solution is not a problem
> (I don't use that machine for anything else!) but I too like the idea of a
> disclaimer.
Me too. I stopped testing the beta releases because of the intervals
without a working beta. When I do use POV that is often work related and
there are just those instances with (other persons) deadlines that I
cannot afford to not being able to render a scene while fiddling with
the system clock is also not an option.
>
> Keep up the good work, it's definitely appreciated. :)
seconded
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
> Me too. I stopped testing the beta releases because of the intervals
> without a working beta. When I do use POV that is often work related and
> there are just those instances with (other persons) deadlines that I
> cannot afford to not being able to render a scene while fiddling with
> the system clock is also not an option.
I used 3.7 beta for my work in July, fortunately in "working" period
;-). The scene taked forever with 3.6 (about one and half day) and about
one hour with 3.7 beta. Don't know, if I have some problem with my
installation of 3.6 or if 3.7 is so faster.
>>
>> Keep up the good work, it's definitely appreciated. :)
>
Yes, and I'am looking forward to 3.7 with working radiosity ;-). Will it
have similar algorithm as 3.6, modified to work multithreaded, or
completely new appoach?
Thanks to POV team for their work!
Vaclav
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
