 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scenes\advanced\mediasky.pov looks much darker with pov3.7beta4
than with pov3.6. I believe that the difference in brightness
probably can't be attributed to gamma problems in this case because
it is so pronounced (but I might be wrong, actually; the scene uses
assumed_gamma 1, and I have noticed that the more the assumed_gamma
differs from the default, the more different pov3.7beta will render
it...)
By the way, a minor thing and probably not an issue, but at 320x240
(no aa) pov3.6 takes 1m 20s to render while pov3.7beta4 takes 1m 46s.
Is such a slowdown to be expected?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: Possible problem with mediasky.pov (beta4)
Date: 7 May 2005 10:28:31
Message: <427cd08f$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> gamma problems in this case
There are no "gamma problems", there is simply *no* gamma correction. As
such, if you turn *off* gamma correction in 3.6, every image is supposed to
look the same. If it does not, that is in most case an error :-)
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Chris Cason
Subject: Re: Possible problem with mediasky.pov (beta4)
Date: 7 May 2005 18:48:46
Message: <427d45ce@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> scenes\advanced\mediasky.pov looks much darker with pov3.7beta4
> than with pov3.6. I believe that the difference in brightness
> probably can't be attributed to gamma problems in this case because
> it is so pronounced (but I might be wrong, actually; the scene uses
> assumed_gamma 1, and I have noticed that the more the assumed_gamma
> differs from the default, the more different pov3.7beta will render
> it...)
The stats show a number of differences (especially in shadow ray tests) so
there's definitely something going on there.
> By the way, a minor thing and probably not an issue, but at 320x240
> (no aa) pov3.6 takes 1m 20s to render while pov3.7beta4 takes 1m 46s.
> Is such a slowdown to be expected?
There are some speed issues (it's noted in the announcement). We have more
work to finish in that area.
-- chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> scenes\advanced\mediasky.pov looks much darker with pov3.7beta4
> than with pov3.6. I believe that the difference in brightness
> probably can't be attributed to gamma problems in this case because
> it is so pronounced (but I might be wrong, actually; the scene uses
> assumed_gamma 1, and I have noticed that the more the assumed_gamma
> differs from the default, the more different pov3.7beta will render
> it...)
This is fixed.
thanks,
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
