 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Render this scene more times. Each time I re-render it the rendering time differs
very much from the previous render instance.
Here are my results:
320x240
1) 5 sec.
2) 45 sec.
3) 1 min 18 sec.
4) 5 sec.
5) 5 sec.
6) 45 sec.
And so on. The slower the rendering the better the caustics look.
I also noticed that glass.pov in the incdemo folder now look wrong, very grainy. I
had rendered it with Beta 1 and looked right.
#version 3.5;
global_settings {
assumed_gamma 1.0
photons {count 50000 autostop 0}
}
// ----------------------------------------
camera {
location <0.0, 0.5, -4.0>
right x*image_width/image_height
look_at <0.0, 0.0, 0.0>
}
light_source {
<-30,30,-30>
rgb 1
}
// ----------------------------------------
plane {
y, -1
pigment { rgb 1 }
}
sphere {
0.0, 1
pigment {rgbf <.95,.95,.95,.98>}
finish {ambient 0
diffuse 0.05
specular 1
roughness 0.003
reflection {.1,1 fresnel on}
conserve_energy
}
interior {ior 1.5}
photons {target reflection on refraction on}
}
POV-Ray v3.5 Beta 15 Windows ME Athlon.
--
Jonathan.
Home: http://digilander.iol.it/jrgpov
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
JRG wrote:
>
> Render this scene more times. Each time I re-render it the rendering time differs
> very much from the previous render instance.
2nd render many times slower than 1st and better looking.
Win98SE 1GHz Athlon.
_____________
Kari Kivisalo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3cadd801@news.povray.org>, jrg### [at] hotmail com says...
> Render this scene more times. Each time I re-render it the rendering time differs
> very much from the previous render instance.
Heppens here, too.
AthlonXP 1700, Win98SE, beta15
Lutz-Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:59:15 +0200, "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>Render this scene more times. Each time I re-render it the rendering time differs
>very much from the previous render instance.
Confirmed, render times (160x120) varying from 2 to 23 seconds over 10
renders.
Win/ME, PIII (1GHz), 512 MB
/Erkki
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
3.5 beta 16 icl win32, win2k celeron (don't know about mhz, but I think it's
330, 350 or 400 or something like that), resolution 320x240
1) 27 sec
2) 2m 54s
3) 4m 13s
4) 20 sec
5) 22 sec
and varying after this....
--
Apache
http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
apa### [at] yahoocom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Just found this one all by myself :)
I've grabbed 4 different message windows, available if wanted.
Version 3.5.beta.RC2.msvc.win32, Win98SE, Celeron 500, 160 MB.
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote...
> Render this scene more times. Each time I re-render it the rendering time
differs
> very much from the previous render instance.
Fixed for next RC.
-Nathan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
