 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The max_gradient warnings seem to report wrong values if 'open' is used in
the isosurface. This already occurred in previous betas.
Example: 'objects/isosurfaces.pov' reports 'maximum gradient found was
2308.710' for line 61 while the true value should be '1'.
WinPov RC3, Athlon, WinNT.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 26 Apr. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3CCE92AC.BCA6B861@gmx.de> , Christoph Hormann
<chr### [at] gmx de> wrote:
> The max_gradient warnings seem to report wrong values if 'open' is used in
> the isosurface. This already occurred in previous betas.
It really thinks this is the max_gradient. I don't know exactly why, but it
max_gradient works this way...
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: max_gradient warnings incorrect
Date: 30 Apr 2002 09:51:02
Message: <3CCEA147.6119FD24@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> It really thinks this is the max_gradient. I don't know exactly why, but it
> max_gradient works this way...
Anyway it should be changed, otherwise you have no chance avoiding the
warnings.
I don't know the code, but i presume when 'open' is used some necessary
calculation is missing and therefore a wrong max_gradient is calculated in
the end.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 26 Apr. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
