On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:50:45 +1100, Chris Cason wrote:
> 
> "Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message news:3BFCA380.376AEEFF@pacbell.net...
>> This will probably require an official ruling from the POV-Team.
> 
> IMO if it's 100% definitely wrong, then it should be fixed.

I agree with Chris.

-- 
#local R=<7084844682857967,0787982,826975826580>;#macro L(P)concat(#while(P)chr(
mod(P,100)),#local P=P/100;#end"")#end background{rgb 1}text{ttf L(R.x)L(R.y)0,0
translate<-.8,0,-1>}text{ttf L(R.x)L(R.z)0,0translate<-1.6,-.75,-1>}sphere{z/9e3
4/26/2001finish{reflection 1}}//ron.parker@povray.org My opinions, nobody else's

Post a reply to this message

In article <slr### [at] fwicom> , Ron Parker 
<ron### [at] povrayorg>  wrote:

> I agree with Chris.

So do I.

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org

Post a reply to this message

Chris, Ron and Thorsten agreed that:
> if it's 100% definitely wrong, then it should be fixed.

Ok, fixed.

Rune

Post a reply to this message