POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : Beta 34 startup today - 'Unknown error code' Server Time
23 Dec 2024 09:00:21 EST (-0500)
  Beta 34 startup today - 'Unknown error code' (Message 1 to 10 of 11)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>
From: John Coppens
Subject: Beta 34 startup today - 'Unknown error code'
Date: 1 Jan 2010 08:45:40
Message: <20100101104540.38718b50.john@johncoppens.com>
Hello people.

Wanted to redo a file from a few days ago, and I get:

$ povray1 +Iglass.pov 
povray: this pre-release version of POV-Ray for Unix expires in 6 day(s)
and 8 hour(s) 
povray: cannot open the system configuration
file /usr/local/etc/povray/3.7/povray.conf: No such file or directory
Unknown error code
$

This is beta34, started up with the numeric code. Is there a cross-over
problem with the year?

John


Post a reply to this message

From: geep999
Subject: Re: Beta 34 startup today - 'Unknown error code'
Date: 1 Jan 2010 12:40:01
Message: <web.4b3e3253a581b0ac380f8080@news.povray.org>
John Coppens <joh### [at] johncoppenscom> wrote:
> Hello people.
>
> Wanted to redo a file from a few days ago, and I get:
>
> $ povray1 +Iglass.pov
> povray: this pre-release version of POV-Ray for Unix expires in 6 day(s)
> and 8 hour(s)
> povray: cannot open the system configuration
> file /usr/local/etc/povray/3.7/povray.conf: No such file or directory
> Unknown error code
> $
>
> This is beta34, started up with the numeric code. Is there a cross-over
> problem with the year?
>
> John

Hi John,
I have similar problem with beta 34 on Linux - Slackware 12.2 x86.

povray +FT -D +Q9 +A st546.pov
povray: this pre-release version of POV-Ray for Unix expires in 6 day(s) and 4
hour(s)
povray: /home/dad/.povray/3.7/povray.conf: 57: the user setting 'allowed' for
[Shellout Security] is less restrictive than the system 'forbidden' setting in
'/usr/local/etc/povray/3.7/povray.conf': using system setting
Unknown error code

Hope a guru can provide a fix.

Cheers,
Peter


Post a reply to this message

From: geep999
Subject: Re: Beta 34 startup today - 'Unknown error code'
Date: 1 Jan 2010 13:40:00
Message: <web.4b3e4125a581b0ac380f8080@news.povray.org>
"geep999" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> John Coppens <joh### [at] johncoppenscom> wrote:
> > Hello people.
> >
> > Wanted to redo a file from a few days ago, and I get:
> >
> > $ povray1 +Iglass.pov
> > povray: this pre-release version of POV-Ray for Unix expires in 6 day(s)
> > and 8 hour(s)
> > povray: cannot open the system configuration
> > file /usr/local/etc/povray/3.7/povray.conf: No such file or directory
> > Unknown error code
> > $
> >
> > This is beta34, started up with the numeric code. Is there a cross-over
> > problem with the year?
> >
> > John
>
> Hi John,
> I have similar problem with beta 34 on Linux - Slackware 12.2 x86.
>
> povray +FT -D +Q9 +A st546.pov
> povray: this pre-release version of POV-Ray for Unix expires in 6 day(s) and 4
> hour(s)
> povray: /home/dad/.povray/3.7/povray.conf: 57: the user setting 'allowed' for
> [Shellout Security] is less restrictive than the system 'forbidden' setting in
> '/usr/local/etc/povray/3.7/povray.conf': using system setting
> Unknown error code
>
> Hope a guru can provide a fix.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter

Hi - I've found the fix. Seems there was a similar problem in Jan 2009.
In vfe/vfe.cpp line 772.
Change 1262296800 (1 Jan 2010) to something like 2262296800 (9 Sep 2041)
And recompile...
Cheers,
Peter


Post a reply to this message

From: John Coppens
Subject: Re: Beta 34 startup today - 'Unknown error code'
Date: 1 Jan 2010 18:11:21
Message: <20100101201121.2638347c.john@johncoppens.com>
On Fri,  1 Jan 2010 13:38:29 EST
"geep999" <nomail@nomail> wrote:

> Change 1262296800 (1 Jan 2010) to something like 2262296800 (9 Sep 2041)
> And recompile...
> Cheers,
> Peter

Thanks Peter.

I just threw out those 3 lines (same as in a patch I found for Debian)...

John


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Beta 34 startup today - 'Unknown error code'
Date: 1 Jan 2010 22:27:29
Message: <4b3ebd21@news.povray.org>
John Coppens wrote:
> I just threw out those 3 lines (same as in a patch I found for Debian)...

Patch for Debian? Do you mean 3.7 is packaged for Debian?


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Debian packaging POV 3.7 (was: Beta 34 startup today - 'Unknown error code')
Date: 1 Jan 2010 22:35:36
Message: <4b3ebf08@news.povray.org>
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> John Coppens wrote:
>> I just threw out those 3 lines (same as in a patch I found for Debian)...
> 
> Patch for Debian? Do you mean 3.7 is packaged for Debian?

It is:
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/povray

And indeed it gets patched to remove the expiration.

Doesn't this violate the POV-Ray beta restrictions in every possible way? 
I'll consult debian-legal, but I'd like an "opinion" from the POV-Team 
first.


Post a reply to this message

From: John Coppens
Subject: Re: Debian packaging POV 3.7 (was: Beta 34 startup today - 'Unknown error code')
Date: 1 Jan 2010 23:52:02
Message: <20100102015200.544fefcc.john@johncoppens.com>
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:35:36 -0300
Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

> And indeed it gets patched to remove the expiration.
> 
> Doesn't this violate the POV-Ray beta restrictions in every possible
> way? I'll consult debian-legal, but I'd like an "opinion" from the
> POV-Team first.

If I'm not mistaken, the expiration is still there. Only the explicit
year 2010 has been removed. The patch set does 4 things, the only one
related removes that limit, so you can go past 1/1/2010 by using the
betacode.

John


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Debian packaging POV 3.7
Date: 2 Jan 2010 15:14:34
Message: <4b3fa92a$1@news.povray.org>
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> John Coppens wrote:
>>> I just threw out those 3 lines (same as in a patch I found for
>>> Debian)...
>> 
>> Patch for Debian? Do you mean 3.7 is packaged for Debian?
> 
> It is:
> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/povray
> 
> And indeed it gets patched to remove the expiration.
> 
> Doesn't this violate the POV-Ray beta restrictions in every possible way?
> I'll consult debian-legal, but I'd like an "opinion" from the POV-Team
> first.

I have now reported it to debian-legal and to the Debian bugtracker:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563344


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Cason
Subject: Re: Debian packaging POV 3.7
Date: 4 Jan 2010 17:36:38
Message: <4b426d76$1@news.povray.org>
On 3/01/2010 7:14 AM, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> John Coppens wrote:
>>>> I just threw out those 3 lines (same as in a patch I found for
>>>> Debian)...
>>> 
>>> Patch for Debian? Do you mean 3.7 is packaged for Debian?
>> 
>> It is:
>> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/povray
>> 
>> And indeed it gets patched to remove the expiration.
>> 
>> Doesn't this violate the POV-Ray beta restrictions in every possible way?
>> I'll consult debian-legal, but I'd like an "opinion" from the POV-Team
>> first.
> 
> I have now reported it to debian-legal and to the Debian bugtracker:
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563344
> 

If they follow the source modification instructions on the source download
page then I'd probably be OK with it.

-- Chris


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Debian packaging POV 3.7
Date: 4 Jan 2010 22:21:25
Message: <4b42b035@news.povray.org>
Chris Cason wrote:
> On 3/01/2010 7:14 AM, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> It is:
>>> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/povray
>>> 
>>> And indeed it gets patched to remove the expiration.
>>> 
>>> Doesn't this violate the POV-Ray beta restrictions in every possible
>>> way? I'll consult debian-legal, but I'd like an "opinion" from the
>>> POV-Team first.
>> 
>> I have now reported it to debian-legal and to the Debian bugtracker:
>> 
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563344
>> 
> If they follow the source modification instructions on the source download
> page then I'd probably be OK with it.

I'm sure you'll have to be more specific/formal for it to matter; pretend 
you're talking to a lawyer :)

What source modification instructions on what page? That modifications have 
to be dual-licensed with GPL3? That's the only relevant "instruction" I 
found on the webpages.

OK with what? With them redistributing POV betas? OK with distributing 
source code too? OK with disabling the hard-limit on beta expiration?


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.