William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> The form and feel of this bug rings a bell. There was some other bug
> recently due a similar move from reference counting to smart pointers
> that I patched by creating a local copy of something to itself be what
> was really copied because the original smart pointer controlled to be
> copied version was going poof too quickly.
Yeah - I vaguely recall that too. Was it with the heightfield stuff?
Post a reply to this message
|