William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Trick helps enough, I wonder if some other inbuilts could benefit from a
> float over double option too.
does the .. cost of extra speed, in context, matter so much? asking because
(and perhaps I'm completely off-track) only today was a post (by user 'guarnio')
where the problem is/was the range of float not being enough.
> But, I'm deleting many of the more obscure
> built in functions(1). We have functions for shapes and 'things' that
> are interesting to run - once - but not generally useful otherwise. Plus
> the values and polarities are all over the place with them. Leaves not
> many functions where the trick might apply.
> Bill P.
> (1) - Maybe at some point down the road I'll create a f_museum()
> function and roll all of the obscure stuff into that one function by index.
I think that if 'f_museum' is created first, and then various functions
"retired" there, they'll remain available at all times. ("v good" at voicing my
Post a reply to this message