 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
I've been away from POV-Ray for a few years, but getting back into it. I have
started re-rendering my earlier animations in 1280x720, assembling in ffmpeg,
and uploading to:
https://vimeo.com/channels/402842
Lots more still be be rendered.
Henry
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/10/2012 5:45 PM, HenryW wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been away from POV-Ray for a few years, but getting back into it. I have
> started re-rendering my earlier animations in 1280x720, assembling in ffmpeg,
> and uploading to:
>
> https://vimeo.com/channels/402842
>
> Lots more still be be rendered.
>
I like it, Henry. But I think that it would be more impressive if the
rotation were slower. It revolves too fast for my eyes to take in the
detail.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
HenryW wrote:
> https://vimeo.com/channels/402842
Nice.
In case you also rerender you crowd scenes, I think they would
gain a lot from better proportions of your pov people (wider torso,
larger head, slighly thicker arms, legs *under* torso!). The
distance shots look good already.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfr de> wrote:
> HenryW wrote:
>
> > https://vimeo.com/channels/402842
>
> Nice.
>
> In case you also rerender you crowd scenes, I think they would
> gain a lot from better proportions of your pov people (wider torso,
> larger head, slighly thicker arms, legs *under* torso!). The
> distance shots look good already.
It's fun playing around with the people dimensions and getting the random logic
correct. Thanks for the suggests, I'll keep tweaking them. I need to work on the
positioning logic, a few of them are standing on top of each other. Is there a
way in POV to find out if an object occupies a point in space, so another random
spot could be generated?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 11/10/2012 5:45 PM, HenryW wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been away from POV-Ray for a few years, but getting back into it. I have
> > started re-rendering my earlier animations in 1280x720, assembling in ffmpeg,
> > and uploading to:
> >
> > https://vimeo.com/channels/402842
> >
> > Lots more still be be rendered.
> >
> I like it, Henry. But I think that it would be more impressive if the
> rotation were slower. It revolves too fast for my eyes to take in the
> detail.
Thanks for the suggestion Stephen. I does spin too fast. I will render another
version with a slower spin.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christian Froeschlin
Subject: Re: Re-rendering animations in 720p
Date: 12 Oct 2012 16:17:38
Message: <50787ae2@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
HenryW wrote:
> It's fun playing around with the people dimensions and getting the random logic
> correct. Thanks for the suggests, I'll keep tweaking them. I need to work on the
> positioning logic, a few of them are standing on top of each other. Is there a
> way in POV to find out if an object occupies a point in space, so another random
> spot could be generated?
yes, have a look at the trace() function
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
or try inside(O,V) It returns either 0.0, when the vector V is outside
the object, specified by the object-identifier O, or 1.0 if it is inside.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Leroy <lrw### [at] joplincom> wrote:
> or try inside(O,V) It returns either 0.0, when the vector V is outside
> the object, specified by the object-identifier O, or 1.0 if it is inside.
That's a neat trick I didn't know of. (And using trace() along with it.) I'll
assume that inside() looks at the bounding-box or bounding volume of the object.
Thanks for the tip. I need to experiment, to find the proper methodology for
using it in a #while loop.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
