I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking 
them down. It is quite fun.

https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
> them down. It is quite fun.
>
> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen

You continue to explore!  :)))

Post a reply to this message

On 2/8/2017 5:24 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
>> them down. It is quite fun.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>>       Stephen
>
> You continue to explore!  :)))
>
>

Yes. :) Which reminds me. Where can I get a stable copy of your 
exporter? I would like to try it.
I had to export the meshes and convert them with PoseRay before I could 
render in PovRay. The official exporter hangs when using Physics. :(




-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 2/8/2017 5:24 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> > Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
> >> them down. It is quite fun.
> >>
> >> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>       Stephen
> >
> > You continue to explore!  :)))
> >
> >
>
> Yes. :) Which reminds me. Where can I get a stable copy of your
> exporter? I would like to try it.
> I had to export the meshes and convert them with PoseRay before I could
> render in PovRay. The official exporter hangs when using Physics. :(
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen

Can you give me the problem file?
http://pasteall.org/blend/
Or contact Mr.
This is an effective way to find problems.
I can not imagine the hangs reason.

I do not think my version stable.
It requires a complete renovation for Constructive Solid Geometry.
https://github.com/Lanuhum/BlendPov-alternative

Post a reply to this message

On 2/8/2017 7:26 PM, LanuHum wrote:

>
> Can you give me the problem file?
> http://pasteall.org/blend/
> Or contact Mr.
> This is an effective way to find problems.
> I can not imagine the hangs reason.
>
It is not the file. It is as if the Physics module is broken and fields 
are missing. When I start to render, that is when it hangs and writes an 
empty pov file. Similarly to some of the bug files I reported a few 
weeks ago,


> I do not think my version stable.
> It requires a complete renovation for Constructive Solid Geometry.
> https://github.com/Lanuhum/BlendPov-alternative
>
>
>
Thanks, I'll have a look and bear it in mind.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 8-2-2017 17:20, Stephen wrote:
> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
> them down. It is quite fun.
>
> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>
>

Was that the day Potus was in town?  ;-)

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Am 09.02.2017 um 08:56 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> On 8-2-2017 17:20, Stephen wrote:
>> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
>> them down. It is quite fun.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>>
>>
> 
> Was that the day Potus was in town?  ;-)

Walls, golf, and a Scotsman feeling the irresistible urge to destroy
/something/? Naaaah... probably just a pure coincidence ;)

Post a reply to this message

On 2/9/2017 8:44 AM, clipka wrote:
> Am 09.02.2017 um 08:56 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>> On 8-2-2017 17:20, Stephen wrote:
>>> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
>>> them down. It is quite fun.
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Was that the day Potus was in town?  ;-)
>
> Walls, golf, and a Scotsman feeling the irresistible urge to destroy
> /something/? Naaaah... probably just a pure coincidence ;)
>
Well I find something quite soothing about watching destruction raining 
down.
And I do have a quote handy.

As flies to wanton boys are we to th' gods,
They kill us for their sport.

King Lear Act 4, scene 1, 32–37



Speaking about golf. It reminded me of the days I played computer golf 
on a line printer. (Nineteen mumble, mumble)
Too much trouble workflowing this into PovRay.

https://youtu.be/ZTPBP1ZBATo


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Am 09.02.2017 um 10:47 schrieb Stephen:

> Speaking about golf. It reminded me of the days I played computer golf
> on a line printer. (Nineteen mumble, mumble)

Don't be ridiculous, line printer golf wasn't invented until two years
later.

> Too much trouble workflowing this into PovRay.

For the sake of nostalgia, guess I could implement some ASCII output
format for printing animations on fanfold paper ;)

Post a reply to this message

On 2/9/2017 11:14 AM, clipka wrote:
> Am 09.02.2017 um 10:47 schrieb Stephen:
>
>> Speaking about golf. It reminded me of the days I played computer golf
>> on a line printer. (Nineteen mumble, mumble)
>
> Don't be ridiculous, line printer golf wasn't invented until two years
> later.
>

The hole is 370 yards away.
The wind speed is 12 ft/s from behind.

*Club	[1]
*Strength	[7.5]



---------------------------*--------------------X------



>> Too much trouble workflowing this into PovRay.
>
> For the sake of nostalgia, guess I could implement some ASCII output
> format for printing animations on fanfold paper ;)
>

Did they ever exist?
Good idea if you could get your hands on that type of printer.


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:

> https://youtu.be/ZTPBP1ZBATo


You should seriously reconsider the short description of that video.   :O

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:


> > For the sake of nostalgia, guess I could implement some ASCII output
> > format for printing animations on fanfold paper ;)

I was thinking your latest micro-POV experiment would make a cool retro
ASCII-art option.   :)

> Did they ever exist?
> Good idea if you could get your hands on that type of printer.

We get them in from time to time here in NH.
I think we got rid of 2 pallets of OKIdata dot matrix printers a few months ago,
and we get various other brands in here & there.

Shipping internationally would be --- prohibitively expensive.

Post a reply to this message

"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> I think we got rid of 2 pallets of OKIdata dot matrix printers a few months ago

My first printer was OKImate (20?) with color ribbon. What a thrill to see color
printing at home, awful as it was on plain paper. Talk about going back a ways
in time, 30 years ago!

I watched the golf wall destruction over and over, and the flag not falling
shows defiance was my thought.

Bob

Post a reply to this message

On 2/9/2017 12:58 PM, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>
>> https://youtu.be/ZTPBP1ZBATo
>
>
> You should seriously reconsider the short description of that video.   :O
>
>

Colour me naive or a simple soul but... ^_^

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 2/9/2017 1:57 PM, omniverse wrote:
> "Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>> I think we got rid of 2 pallets of OKIdata dot matrix printers a few months ago
>
> My first printer was OKImate (20?) with color ribbon. What a thrill to see color
> printing at home, awful as it was on plain paper. Talk about going back a ways
> in time, 30 years ago!
>

Colour printing, do you mean the black and red ribbons?
The machine I remember was an 80 column golf ball printer.

> I watched the golf wall destruction over and over, and the flag not falling
> shows defiance was my thought.
>
There is something hypnotic about watching these things. Especially in 
slow motion as the frames are rendered.
The flag was the result of me increasing the weight of the flag post to 
stop the flag tearing away. When the problem was in the animation 
settings of the flag.




-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 2/9/2017 1:57 PM, omniverse wrote:
>
> > I watched the golf wall destruction over and over, and the flag not falling
> > shows defiance was my thought.
> >
> The flag was the result of me increasing the weight of the flag post to
> stop the flag tearing away. When the problem was in the animation
> settings of the flag.

Maybe a direct hit by a golf ball would have toppled it anyhow, as opposed to
the big slow blocks pushing it around. Those were obviously the powerful force
there.

Bob

Post a reply to this message

On 2/10/2017 10:31 AM, omniverse wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 2/9/2017 1:57 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>
>>> I watched the golf wall destruction over and over, and the flag not falling
>>> shows defiance was my thought.
>>>
>> The flag was the result of me increasing the weight of the flag post to
>> stop the flag tearing away. When the problem was in the animation
>> settings of the flag.
>
> Maybe a direct hit by a golf ball would have toppled it anyhow, as opposed to
> the big slow blocks pushing it around. Those were obviously the powerful force
> there.
>

It is the mass, it is ten tons to the block's one ton and it is all on 
the base. That and it can't be broken.



-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 2/9/2017 7:56 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 8-2-2017 17:20, Stephen wrote:
>> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
>> them down. It is quite fun.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>>
>>
>
> Was that the day Potus was in town?  ;-)
>

No this last one was during that visit.

https://youtu.be/g2fC1QSEQfM



-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 10-2-2017 12:09, Stephen wrote:
> On 2/9/2017 7:56 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 8-2-2017 17:20, Stephen wrote:
>>> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
>>> them down. It is quite fun.
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Was that the day Potus was in town?  ;-)
>>
>
> No this last one was during that visit.
>
> https://youtu.be/g2fC1QSEQfM
>
>
>

ROFL !

Now, be sure to expect the men in black on your doorstep within days! ;-)

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

On 2/10/2017 12:19 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 10-2-2017 12:09, Stephen wrote:
>> On 2/9/2017 7:56 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> On 8-2-2017 17:20, Stephen wrote:
>>>> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
>>>> them down. It is quite fun.
>>>>
>>>> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Was that the day Potus was in town?  ;-)
>>>
>>
>> No this last one was during that visit.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/g2fC1QSEQfM
>>
>>
>>
>
> ROFL !
>
> Now, be sure to expect the men in black on your doorstep within days! ;-)
>

Shame that I will never know as I'm not on Twatter. ;-)

To be fair. Mrs Clinton is in there too. You just can't see her for very 
long. So it is fair political comment that the last Presidential 
election split the country and and looks to paint over the words from 
Emma Lazarus's poem.


"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 10-2-2017 13:38, Stephen wrote:
> On 2/10/2017 12:19 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 10-2-2017 12:09, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 2/9/2017 7:56 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>> On 8-2-2017 17:20, Stephen wrote:
>>>>> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
>>>>> them down. It is quite fun.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Was that the day Potus was in town?  ;-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> No this last one was during that visit.
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/g2fC1QSEQfM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ROFL !
>>
>> Now, be sure to expect the men in black on your doorstep within days! ;-)
>>
>
> Shame that I will never know as I'm not on Twatter. ;-)
>
> To be fair. Mrs Clinton is in there too. You just can't see her for very
> long. So it is fair political comment that the last Presidential
> election split the country and and looks to paint over the words from
> Emma Lazarus's poem.
>
>
> "Give me your tired, your poor,
> Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
> The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
> Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
> I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
>
>

No comments needed. Well done!

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

On 2/8/2017 7:26 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> I do not think my version stable.
> It requires a complete renovation for Constructive Solid Geometry.
> https://github.com/Lanuhum/BlendPov-alternative


I downloaded it and installed the zip file but cannot find it in user 
preferences to activate it.
Using Blender Ver. 2.78.
Any tips?

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 2/8/2017 7:26 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> > I do not think my version stable.
> > It requires a complete renovation for Constructive Solid Geometry.
> > https://github.com/Lanuhum/BlendPov-alternative
>
>
> I downloaded it and installed the zip file but cannot find it in user
> preferences to activate it.
> Using Blender Ver. 2.78.
> Any tips?
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen


unpack zip file
move the "povray" folder to
if installer blender-278:
C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\AppData\Roaming\Blender
Foundation\Blender\2.78\scripts\addons
if zip file blender-278:
\path\to\blender-2.78x-windowsxx\2.78\scripts\addons

Blender start. Go to user preferences -> add-ons -> render -> check
Render:Povray with BlendPov-alternative exporter.
If error -> uncheck official addon, save user setting and restart Blender and
check Render:Povray with BlendPov-alternative exporter.

If you get a clean file .pov, the failure gives the exporter script.
I will need your file to the scene of the blender

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
> them down. It is quite fun.
>
> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen

Blender Physics?  This is an outside program?  Not part of POV-Ray?

Klewlis

Post a reply to this message

On 2/12/2017 12:48 AM, Klewlis wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> I have been playing with Blender Physics. Building things and knocking
>> them down. It is quite fun.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/9Fgd2HWAacA
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>>       Stephen
>
> Blender Physics?  This is an outside program?  Not part of POV-Ray?
>
> Klewlis
>
>
Yes it is a free program with suit of modelling/animation modules and more.

https://www.blender.org/

There is a team developing a PovRay exporter to render directly using 
PovRay.
Blender Physics is an implementation of Bullet Physics.
http://bulletphysics.org/wordpress/

In the first animation I exported all of the Blender objects and 
converted the OBJ files to Mesh2 using PoseRay. Then I rendered them in 
Pov. The other couple of animations were done using Blender's internal 
renderer.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 2/11/2017 6:46 PM, LanuHum wrote:

>
>
> unpack zip file
> move the "povray" folder to
> if installer blender-278:
> C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\AppData\Roaming\Blender
> Foundation\Blender\2.78\scripts\addons
> if zip file blender-278:
> \path\to\blender-2.78x-windowsxx\2.78\scripts\addons
>
> Blender start. Go to user preferences -> add-ons -> render -> check
> Render:Povray with BlendPov-alternative exporter.
> If error -> uncheck official addon, save user setting and restart Blender and
> check Render:Povray with BlendPov-alternative exporter.
>

Thank you that worked. I got it installed and working.
I did an upgrade to Blender 2.78b to get a clean copy of the official 
exporter. I still have a problem with the Physics tab. Selecting a mesh 
and clicking the "bouncing ball" icon. There is nothing there. No 
buttons for the different types of physics systems. A blank underneath 
the properties. Both in your version and in the official one.

I will think about it while I get more experience using the Blender 
Renderer. I need to know how it should work first.

Thanks for your time.



-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 2/11/2017 6:46 PM, LanuHum wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > unpack zip file
> > move the "povray" folder to
> > if installer blender-278:
> > C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\AppData\Roaming\Blender
> > Foundation\Blender\2.78\scripts\addons
> > if zip file blender-278:
> > \path\to\blender-2.78x-windowsxx\2.78\scripts\addons
> >
> > Blender start. Go to user preferences -> add-ons -> render -> check
> > Render:Povray with BlendPov-alternative exporter.
> > If error -> uncheck official addon, save user setting and restart Blender and
> > check Render:Povray with BlendPov-alternative exporter.
> >
>
> Thank you that worked. I got it installed and working.
> I did an upgrade to Blender 2.78b to get a clean copy of the official
> exporter. I still have a problem with the Physics tab. Selecting a mesh
> and clicking the "bouncing ball" icon. There is nothing there. No
> buttons for the different types of physics systems. A blank underneath
> the properties. Both in your version and in the official one.
>
> I will think about it while I get more experience using the Blender
> Renderer. I need to know how it should work first.
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen

Maybe you noticed that once you set things up in Blender Internal and switch
back to POV your physics still export properly? It's a good thing to start
learning Blender internal, as the official exporter has some intent to emulate
it.

Thanks for the report! (and proof that we need more) It's solved and will be
committed to source when I get back to my computer. The below code was missing
line 52 of ui.py in render_povray :

# wrapping every class 'as is'
from bl_ui import properties_physics_common
for member in dir(properties_physics_common):
    subclass = getattr(properties_physics_common, member)
    try:
        subclass.COMPAT_ENGINES.add('POVRAY_RENDER')
    except:
        pass
del properties_physics_common

Post a reply to this message

On 2/15/2017 10:19 AM, Mr wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 2/11/2017 6:46 PM, LanuHum wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> unpack zip file
>>> move the "povray" folder to
>>> if installer blender-278:
>>> C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\AppData\Roaming\Blender
>>> Foundation\Blender\2.78\scripts\addons
>>> if zip file blender-278:
>>> \path\to\blender-2.78x-windowsxx\2.78\scripts\addons
>>>
>>> Blender start. Go to user preferences -> add-ons -> render -> check
>>> Render:Povray with BlendPov-alternative exporter.
>>> If error -> uncheck official addon, save user setting and restart Blender and
>>> check Render:Povray with BlendPov-alternative exporter.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you that worked. I got it installed and working.
>> I did an upgrade to Blender 2.78b to get a clean copy of the official
>> exporter. I still have a problem with the Physics tab. Selecting a mesh
>> and clicking the "bouncing ball" icon. There is nothing there. No
>> buttons for the different types of physics systems. A blank underneath
>> the properties. Both in your version and in the official one.
>>
>> I will think about it while I get more experience using the Blender
>> Renderer. I need to know how it should work first.
>>
>> Thanks for your time.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>>       Stephen
>
> Maybe you noticed that once you set things up in Blender Internal and switch
> back to POV your physics still export properly?

No, I did not notice that before. Thanks for pointing it out.
When I press the animation button. Nothing happens except the UV/image 
editor window sits there. Unless I set the output to a movie format when 
it renders the frames (then deletes them) but no movie file is saved. At 
least I could not find the unique name I used.

> It's a good thing to start
> learning Blender internal, as the official exporter has some intent to emulate
> it.
>
There is a lot of learning in Blender. The rigid body physics is similar 
to Poser physics so that is okay. The animation module layout is not 
intuitive, to me. And the UV mapping. I am getting the hang of it but it 
does not seem right that you wrap a spherical mapping on a globe, 
initially but set the texture to a flat mapping.

Q. Why do I have to have emission greater than zero to see detail on the 
rendered output when using UV mapping and ambient seems to have no effect?


> Thanks for the report! (and proof that we need more)

I am still waiting to get feedback on my previous reports so I can retest.

> It's solved and will be
> committed to source when I get back to my computer.
> The below code was missing
> line 52 of ui.py in render_povray :
>
> # wrapping every class 'as is'
> from bl_ui import properties_physics_common
> for member in dir(properties_physics_common):
>      subclass = getattr(properties_physics_common, member)
>      try:
>          subclass.COMPAT_ENGINES.add('POVRAY_RENDER')
>      except:
>          pass
> del properties_physics_common
>
>


I inserted these lines with two blank lines above and below.
I saw no difference to the Physics tab.
My ui.py file is now 1680 lines and 79.2 KB


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 2/15/2017 10:19 AM, Mr wrote:
> > Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >> On 2/11/2017 6:46 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> unpack zip file
> >>> move the "povray" folder to
> >>> if installer blender-278:
> >>> C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\AppData\Roaming\Blender
> >>> Foundation\Blender\2.78\scripts\addons
> >>> if zip file blender-278:
> >>> \path\to\blender-2.78x-windowsxx\2.78\scripts\addons
> >>>
> >>> Blender start. Go to user preferences -> add-ons -> render -> check
> >>> Render:Povray with BlendPov-alternative exporter.
> >>> If error -> uncheck official addon, save user setting and restart Blender and
> >>> check Render:Povray with BlendPov-alternative exporter.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thank you that worked. I got it installed and working.
> >> I did an upgrade to Blender 2.78b to get a clean copy of the official
> >> exporter. I still have a problem with the Physics tab. Selecting a mesh
> >> and clicking the "bouncing ball" icon. There is nothing there. No
> >> buttons for the different types of physics systems. A blank underneath
> >> the properties. Both in your version and in the official one.
> >>
> >> I will think about it while I get more experience using the Blender
> >> Renderer. I need to know how it should work first.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your time.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>       Stephen
> >
> > Maybe you noticed that once you set things up in Blender Internal and switch
> > back to POV your physics still export properly?
>
> No, I did not notice that before. Thanks for pointing it out.
> When I press the animation button. Nothing happens except the UV/image
> editor window sits there. Unless I set the output to a movie format when
> it renders the frames (then deletes them) but no movie file is saved. At
> least I could not find the unique name I used.
>
> > It's a good thing to start
> > learning Blender internal, as the official exporter has some intent to emulate
> > it.
> >
> There is a lot of learning in Blender. The rigid body physics is similar
> to Poser physics so that is okay. The animation module layout is not
> intuitive, to me. And the UV mapping. I am getting the hang of it but it
> does not seem right that you wrap a spherical mapping on a globe,
> initially but set the texture to a flat mapping.
>
> Q. Why do I have to have emission greater than zero to see detail on the
> rendered output when using UV mapping and ambient seems to have no effect?
>
>
> > Thanks for the report! (and proof that we need more)
>
> I am still waiting to get feedback on my previous reports so I can retest.
>
> > It's solved and will be
> > committed to source when I get back to my computer.
> > The below code was missing
> > line 52 of ui.py in render_povray :
> >
> > # wrapping every class 'as is'
> > from bl_ui import properties_physics_common
> > for member in dir(properties_physics_common):
> >      subclass = getattr(properties_physics_common, member)
> >      try:
> >          subclass.COMPAT_ENGINES.add('POVRAY_RENDER')
> >      except:
> >          pass
> > del properties_physics_common
> >
> >
>
>
> I inserted these lines with two blank lines above and below.
> I saw no difference to the Physics tab.
> My ui.py file is now 1680 lines and 79.2 KB
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen

Now it's committed back to trunk (ou can get a snapshot here:
https://git.blender.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi/blender-addons.git/tree/refs/heads/master:/render_povray

Does it solve your issue?

Post a reply to this message

On 2/17/2017 11:54 AM, Mr wrote:
> Now it's committed back to trunk (ou can get a snapshot here:
>
https://git.blender.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi/blender-addons.git/tree/refs/heads/master:/render_povray
>
> Does it solve your issue?

It might have or it might be that I got my knickers in a twist with the 
addon folders over the versions.
Following my usual quick and dirty backup methods. I copied the folder 
to the parent folder as a copy. When I updated render_povray it was the 
same and the material tab was empty. Then I moved the backup folders and 
it works the way it should.
Thanks and sorry for the confusion.


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message