 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This movie is coming from the discussion in .advanced-users called "Math held
needed please:" by Andrew Cocker.
Please see the discussion over there for the explanation, as I dont' like
repeating myself (I usually contradict myself to boot)
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritone com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'circle.mov' (304 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Josh,
Thankyou for your endeavours towards solving my problem...unfortunately I cannot
view
this movie. I've tried it in quicktime 2 and 3.
Someone will also no doubt point out if I don't that this should have been posted
to
binaries.animation ;-)
--
----------------------
Andy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
--The Home Of Lunaland--
--visit my POV-Ray gallery--
--listen to my music--
www.acocker.freeserve.co.uk
Josh English <eng### [at] spiritonecom> wrote in message
news:371CD57A.3B29FCDB@spiritone.com...
> This movie is coming from the discussion in .advanced-users called "Math held
> needed please:" by Andrew Cocker.
>
> Please see the discussion over there for the explanation, as I dont' like
> repeating myself (I usually contradict myself to boot)
>
> Josh English
> eng### [at] spiritonecom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Same here, broken movie.
Andrew Cocker wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> Thankyou for your endeavours towards solving my problem...unfortunately I cannot
view
> this movie. I've tried it in quicktime 2 and 3.
>
> Someone will also no doubt point out if I don't that this should have been
posted to
> binaries.animation ;-)
>
> --
> ----------------------
> Andy
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --The Home Of Lunaland--
> --visit my POV-Ray gallery--
> --listen to my music--
> www.acocker.freeserve.co.uk
>
> Josh English <eng### [at] spiritonecom> wrote in message
> news:371CD57A.3B29FCDB@spiritone.com...
> > This movie is coming from the discussion in .advanced-users called "Math held
> > needed please:" by Andrew Cocker.
> >
> > Please see the discussion over there for the explanation, as I dont' like
> > repeating myself (I usually contradict myself to boot)
> >
> > Josh English
> > eng### [at] spiritonecom
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bloody hell.... So am I. It does look like it downloads the entire thing first, then
throws up
the broken link icon. I posted it from my Mac, and I've tried it on my Windows box and
failed,
on the Mac Netscape actually opens the file in a Navigator window...and breaks...
but I've put it on my site as well, so try this link:
http://www.spiritone.com/~english/circle.mov
and see if that works.
Josh
Andrew Cocker wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> Thankyou for your endeavours towards solving my problem...unfortunately I cannot
view
> this movie. I've tried it in quicktime 2 and 3.
>
> Someone will also no doubt point out if I don't that this should have been
posted to
> binaries.animation ;-)
>
> --
> ----------------------
> Andy
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --The Home Of Lunaland--
> --visit my POV-Ray gallery--
> --listen to my music--
> www.acocker.freeserve.co.uk
>
> Josh English <eng### [at] spiritonecom> wrote in message
> news:371CD57A.3B29FCDB@spiritone.com...
> > This movie is coming from the discussion in .advanced-users called "Math held
> > needed please:" by Andrew Cocker.
> >
> > Please see the discussion over there for the explanation, as I dont' like
> > repeating myself (I usually contradict myself to boot)
> >
> > Josh English
> > eng### [at] spiritonecom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invalid file apparently, at least that's all I get here with Quicktime
2.
I checked to make sure my player wasn't broken by playing another *.mov
file here, seems ok.
Maybe this has to have QT3.
Josh English wrote:
>
> Bloody hell.... So am I. It does look like it downloads the entire thing first, then
throws up
> the broken link icon. I posted it from my Mac, and I've tried it on my Windows box
and failed,
> on the Mac Netscape actually opens the file in a Navigator window...and breaks...
>
> but I've put it on my site as well, so try this link:
>
> http://www.spiritone.com/~english/circle.mov
>
> and see if that works.
>
> Josh
>
> Andrew Cocker wrote:
>
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > Thankyou for your endeavours towards solving my problem...unfortunately I
cannot view
> > this movie. I've tried it in quicktime 2 and 3.
> >
> > Someone will also no doubt point out if I don't that this should have been
posted to
> > binaries.animation ;-)
> >
> > --
> > ----------------------
> > Andy
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > --The Home Of Lunaland--
> > --visit my POV-Ray gallery--
> > --listen to my music--
> > www.acocker.freeserve.co.uk
> >
> > Josh English <eng### [at] spiritonecom> wrote in message
> > news:371CD57A.3B29FCDB@spiritone.com...
> > > This movie is coming from the discussion in .advanced-users called "Math held
> > > needed please:" by Andrew Cocker.
> > >
> > > Please see the discussion over there for the explanation, as I dont' like
> > > repeating myself (I usually contradict myself to boot)
> > >
> > > Josh English
> > > eng### [at] spiritonecom
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's a quicktime movie renedered directly from POV on the Mac.
Bob Hughes wrote:
> Invalid file apparently, at least that's all I get here with Quicktime
> 2.
> I checked to make sure my player wasn't broken by playing another *.mov
> file here, seems ok.
> Maybe this has to have QT3.
>
> Josh English wrote:
> >
> > Bloody hell.... So am I. It does look like it downloads the entire thing first,
then throws up
> > the broken link icon. I posted it from my Mac, and I've tried it on my Windows box
and failed,
> > on the Mac Netscape actually opens the file in a Navigator window...and breaks...
> >
> > but I've put it on my site as well, so try this link:
> >
> > http://www.spiritone.com/~english/circle.mov
> >
> > and see if that works.
> >
> > Josh
> >
> > Andrew Cocker wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Josh,
> > >
> > > Thankyou for your endeavours towards solving my problem...unfortunately I
cannot view
> > > this movie. I've tried it in quicktime 2 and 3.
> > >
> > > Someone will also no doubt point out if I don't that this should have been
posted to
> > > binaries.animation ;-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > ----------------------
> > > Andy
> > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > --The Home Of Lunaland--
> > > --visit my POV-Ray gallery--
> > > --listen to my music--
> > > www.acocker.freeserve.co.uk
> > >
> > > Josh English <eng### [at] spiritonecom> wrote in message
> > > news:371CD57A.3B29FCDB@spiritone.com...
> > > > This movie is coming from the discussion in .advanced-users called "Math held
> > > > needed please:" by Andrew Cocker.
> > > >
> > > > Please see the discussion over there for the explanation, as I dont' like
> > > > repeating myself (I usually contradict myself to boot)
> > > >
> > > > Josh English
> > > > eng### [at] spiritonecom
>
> --
> omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
> mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Josh English wrote:
>
> It's a quicktime movie renedered directly
> from POV on the Mac.
/\
^||^
/_||_\
||
||
Mystery Solved
<grin>
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey hey watch it now..... I'm a die hard Mac fan and I when
Windowsbecomes stable enough (hah) I'll look into that as a suitable
OS... I'm a bit afraid of Unix and it's offspring, tho. (So Unix lovers
will not flame me -- I beleive people who say it is a hell of a lot
better than Mac or Windows, but I'll stick with what I know as far as my
OS goes.
Besides, I've rendered QT movies directly from POV -Ray on my Mac before
and there were no problems reading them from posts in the past. I also
have an updated version of the movie, so I'll post it here.
Josh
Ken wrote:
> Josh English wrote:
> >
> > It's a quicktime movie renedered directly
> > from POV on the Mac.
> /\
> ^||^
> /_||_\
> ||
> ||
> Mystery Solved
>
> <grin>
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Josh English wrote:
>
> Hey hey watch it now..... I'm a die hard Mac fan and I when
> Windowsbecomes stable enough (hah) I'll look into that as a suitable
> OS... I'm a bit afraid of Unix and it's offspring, tho. (So Unix lovers
> will not flame me -- I beleive people who say it is a hell of a lot
> better than Mac or Windows, but I'll stick with what I know as far as my
> OS goes.
> Josh
I was not really intending to bash Mac's as an operating system as much
as I was pointing out that there have always been issues involved with
compatability between the different OS's where files and type are concerned.
You might for example have the latest compression codek for apples quick
time movies that have not filtered down to the PC level yet. Perhaps
there is a possible option usable on Mac's that might be affecting a PC
users ability to view it properly. I am unfamiliar with MAc computers
but the compatibility issue is one that is well doumented in the history
of the home computer industry.
That is all I was really trying to imply. Ok I will admit I may have
done so a little more diplomaticly as I may did, but it was definitely
NOT a complete and total Mac attack on my part either. I suggest instead
that you defensivly took it that way of you own accord and the blame for
that cannot be transfered to me.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The compatibility problems have a long, but consistent history. Basically the
Mac has always supported converting files from DOS. In the old days it was a
little piece of hardware added to the network cable. Nowadays it's all done
with software. The Mac now mounts, reads and writes to DOS files and disks
invisibly.
On the other hand, Microsoft never saw any need to add compatibility with Mac
files, and they still don't as a general rule ( Office 98 is an exception ).
For the Windows user to read a Mac file a 3rd party converter is required.
The Mac publisher can target Windows users by flattening the files before
exporting them. In this manner, the Windows user will not need to employ the
converter on Mac files. When a Mac user opens one of these flattened Windows
files everything proceeds normally and there is no problem.
When posting scene and animation files from a Mac to the POV-Ray group, Mac
publishers may wish to flatten the file before uploading. Windows users may
wish to install a Mac converter.
Ken wrote:
> Josh English wrote:
> >
> > Hey hey watch it now..... I'm a die hard Mac fan and I when
> > Windowsbecomes stable enough (hah) I'll look into that as a suitable
> > OS... I'm a bit afraid of Unix and it's offspring, tho. (So Unix lovers
> > will not flame me -- I beleive people who say it is a hell of a lot
> > better than Mac or Windows, but I'll stick with what I know as far as my
> > OS goes.
>
> > Josh
>
> I was not really intending to bash Mac's as an operating system as much
> as I was pointing out that there have always been issues involved with
> compatability between the different OS's where files and type are concerned.
> You might for example have the latest compression codek for apples quick
> time movies that have not filtered down to the PC level yet. Perhaps
> there is a possible option usable on Mac's that might be affecting a PC
> users ability to view it properly. I am unfamiliar with MAc computers
> but the compatibility issue is one that is well doumented in the history
> of the home computer industry.
> That is all I was really trying to imply. Ok I will admit I may have
> done so a little more diplomaticly as I may did, but it was definitely
> NOT a complete and total Mac attack on my part either. I suggest instead
> that you defensivly took it that way of you own accord and the blame for
> that cannot be transfered to me.
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
