 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-1-2012 17:46, Saul Luizaga wrote:
> Yes, looks a good choice, and there are other free modelers out there
> that I'm getting to know them. the interface is now customizable
> although I haven't tried Blender just yet.
Wings3d might also be a good choice for you. http://www.wings3d.com/
Some time ago I read or heard about that change in the Blender
interface. I shall go back to it one day certainly ;-) At this moment I
am quite happy with Silo2 (which is not a free product).
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thx but Wings3D is not free neither and reviwers say is like Blender so
I'll go with Blender for now.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Saul Luizaga on date 27/01/2012 09:55 wrote:
> Thx but Wings3D is not free neither and reviwers say is like Blender so
> I'll go with Blender for now.
Blender is a complete suite, but Wings 3D is more intuitive and fast to
use (and open source, released under BSD license).
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27-1-2012 9:55, Saul Luizaga wrote:
> Thx but Wings3D is not free neither and reviwers say is like Blender so
> I'll go with Blender for now.
I think you are mistaken here. The site says: [quote] Wings 3D is open
source and completely free for use in both personal and commercial
projects.[unquote]; and I have always used it for free.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 27-1-2012 9:55, Saul Luizaga wrote:
>> Thx but Wings3D is not free neither and reviwers say is like Blender so
>> I'll go with Blender for now.
>
> I think you are mistaken here. The site says: [quote] Wings 3D is open
> source and completely free for use in both personal and commercial
> projects.[unquote]; and I have always used it for free.
>
> Thomas
hmmm, I see... maybe it was commercial before because of what I have
read in YouTube, glad to read that, thanks Thomas.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27-1-2012 17:47, Saul Luizaga wrote:
> hmmm, I see... maybe it was commercial before because of what I have
> read in YouTube, glad to read that, thanks Thomas.
Then YouTube did not know what it was talking about :-) because for as
long as I have known Wings (>10 years) it has been free.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Probably, and I didn't took the time to look myself, I have so much to
read now, this 3D world is huge and with many 3D options to chose from
and investigate to see what they do, is awful lot of time just doing that.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
[...]Povray will probably remain a
> program for the gurus.
>
> Larry
Pov-ray user: A person who uses a free program with no graphical interface that
has been updated 3.7 times in 20 years.
B Gimeno
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> >Saul Luizaga on date 27/01/2012 09:55 wrote:
> > Thx but Wings3D is not free neither and reviwers say is like Blender so
> > I'll go with Blender for now.
> Blender is a complete suite, but Wings 3D is more intuitive and fast to
> use (and open source, released under BSD license).
> Paolo
Have you tried Art of Illusion? Also free, cross-platform (java) and has a
POV-exporter. http://aoi.sourceforge.net
H
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1/28/2012 3:30 PM, B. Gimeno wrote:
> Pov-ray user: A person who uses a free program with no graphical interface that
> has been updated 3.7 times in 20 years.
My POVRay has always had a UI. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
