|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi There,
anyone tried pov3.6 already? Is it working o.k. with moray? I did not
dare to try it yet :-)
Greets
Arne
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
de news: 40cea9e3$1@news.povray.org...
> Hi There,
> anyone tried pov3.6 already? Is it working o.k. with moray? I did not
> dare to try it yet :-)
>
I didn't face any problem :-)
Unclipped radiosity is a plus
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Arne Kleinophorst wrote:
> Hi There,
> anyone tried pov3.6 already? Is it working o.k. with moray? I did not
> dare to try it yet :-)
>
> Greets
>
> Arne
Hi Arne,
Well I resumed a trace I stopped on 3.5 with 3.6 (a Moray scene, obviously)
and it worked without a hitch.
Guess that means Moray 3.5 will work just fine with 3.6.
Regards,
--
Stefan Viljoen
Software Support Technician
Polar Design Solutions
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
de news: 40cefc6c@news.povray.org...
> Hi Arne,
>
> Well I resumed a trace I stopped on 3.5 with 3.6 (a Moray scene,
obviously)
> and it worked without a hitch.
>
Just beware that radiosity does not render the same in both versions.
I tried that resuming with 3.6 a render started with 3.5, the version change
line was obvious.
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > Well I resumed a trace I stopped on 3.5 with 3.6 (a Moray scene,
> obviously)
> > and it worked without a hitch.
> >
> Just beware that radiosity does not render the same in both versions.
> I tried that resuming with 3.6 a render started with 3.5, the version change
> line was obvious.
IIRC resuming a radiosity trace even with the same version of POV will
give you a noticeable line at the resume point.
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jamie Davison <jam### [at] dslpipexcom> wrote:
> IIRC resuming a radiosity trace even with the same version of POV will
> give you a noticeable line at the resume point.
This shouldn't be true. POV-Ray saves a radiosity tree file for the
exact purpose of avoiding this.
--
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
40cf3f02@news.povray.org...
> Jamie Davison <jam### [at] dslpipexcom> wrote:
> > IIRC resuming a radiosity trace even with the same version of POV will
> > give you a noticeable line at the resume point.
>
> This shouldn't be true. POV-Ray saves a radiosity tree file for the
> exact purpose of avoiding this.
>
I forgot to say that it was a two passes reloaded radiosity file
1st one at low resolution without reflections and refractions saving rad
file and 2nd with reflection and refraction reloading rad file
I didnt use Moray dial for this purpose but rather an InsertCode plugin
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |