 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Any idea when we might be seeing a version of Moray updated for POV 3.5?
Iborg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 20:28:34 -0700, local wrote...
> Any idea when we might be seeing a version of Moray updated for POV 3.5?
>
> Iborg
Check the website (http://www.stmuc.com/moray/menews.html), it's in Alpha
ATM, I think.
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jamie Davison wrote:
> Check the website (http://www.stmuc.com/moray/menews.html), it's in Alpha
> ATM, I think.
Yeah, that's the first place I looked. But that page apparently hasn't been
updated for almost three months.
And no, raytracing hasn't taught me patience. Yet.
Iborg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi local,
Hehe, well that subject line definitely caught my eye :-))
> Any idea when we might be seeing a version of Moray updated for POV 3.5?
Hmmm, let's see..... well, the alpha testers haven't reported anything
for quite some time, so I think we're almost ready to start a
semi-public beta, i.e. one for registered users. They will be informed
by email when it's ready.
I am currently somewhat buried in Real Work, so I cannot devote as
much time to Moray as I would like. But there are some new neat
features in there that many of you will like (and no, I'm not telling
right now :-).
Regards,
- Lutz
email : lut### [at] stmuc com
Web : http://www.stmuc.com/moray
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > Any idea when we might be seeing a version of Moray updated for POV 3.5?
> Hmmm, let's see..... well, the alpha testers haven't reported anything
> for quite some time, so I think we're almost ready to start a
> semi-public beta, i.e. one for registered users. They will be informed
> by email when it's ready.
> I am currently somewhat buried in Real Work, so I cannot devote as
> much time to Moray as I would like. But there are some new neat
> features in there that many of you will like (and no, I'm not telling
> right now :-).
As long as blobs and sphere sweeps are thetre, I don't really care too
much :)
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jamie Davison wrote:
> As long as blobs and sphere sweeps are thetre, I don't really care too
> much :)
Photons, too. Don't care so much for blobs, 'cause I do almost all of
my modelling with primitives (want sphere sweeps to make dangling wires)
hmm also spherical heightfield could be fun to play with.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Timothy R. Cook wrote:
> Jamie Davison wrote:
>> As long as blobs and sphere sweeps are thetre, I don't really care too
>> much :)
>
> Photons, too.
Yeah, I'll take photons and UV mapping,etc, without the hand coding. I
just recently hooked into Moray, and I intend to use it more to setup
scenes (lighting, camera, textures)than to use it for modeling..... Rhino
is, shall we say, a little more robust for model creation.
Iborg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Yeah, I'll take photons and UV mapping,etc, without the hand coding. I
Yes yes yes.
> just recently hooked into Moray, and I intend to use it more to setup
> scenes (lighting, camera, textures)than to use it for modeling..... Rhino
> is, shall we say, a little more robust for model creation.
I too use Moray nearly only for setting up scenes from Rhino.
And I'm quite happy with that combination.
It would be very useful if we could see the imported meshes in a shaded
preview, but there seems to be no easy way.
RAW import is not possible if the size is too big, and the meshes are not
smooth.
I don't think McNeel will update their export filter to the upcoming
advanced UDO format.
So someone had to write a plugin for Rhino, but I'm not able to do so.
Any ideas?
-C-H-A-R-L-E-S-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Any ideas?
I tried to avoid 3DWin because of the complicated workflow.
Because there are no other possibilties I'll try it now.
Maybe in the future it becomes easier.
-C-H-A-R-L-E-S-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Lutz, Master of the Universe....
Date: 18 Jul 2002 05:19:25
Message: <3d36881d@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Aaah!!! The lucky guys that can afford Rhino!!!
Too expensive I'm afraid for the lay persons in this universe. Which is a
pity of course...
But with the next version of Moray + Hamapatch + POV-Ray 3.5 + ... (well,
whatever!) One starts to come closer, isn't it?
Thomas de Groot
"local" <rub### [at] llru> schreef in bericht news:3d365dc1@news.povray.org...
> Timothy R. Cook wrote:
>
> > Jamie Davison wrote:
> >> As long as blobs and sphere sweeps are thetre, I don't really care too
> >> much :)
> >
> > Photons, too.
>
> Yeah, I'll take photons and UV mapping,etc, without the hand coding. I
> just recently hooked into Moray, and I intend to use it more to setup
> scenes (lighting, camera, textures)than to use it for modeling..... Rhino
> is, shall we say, a little more robust for model creation.
>
> Iborg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
