 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
we've all been there... believe me.
Mitchell Waite wrote:
>
> Thanks (duh on my part).
>
> "Dearmad" <dea### [at] applesnake net> wrote in message
> news:3C3E773F.8633F264@applesnake.net...
> > type "visibility" into the help file and read that- it'll explain
> > it in detail.
> > --
> > Current obsession: "Ballet pour ma fille."
> > http://www.applesnake.net
--
Current obsession: "Ballet pour ma fille."
http://www.applesnake.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi mitchell!
Dearmads visibility levels only changes the visibility of objects in
moray. if you want objects not to be rendered, you must uncheck the
render-checkbox of the objects.
alex
Mitchell Waite wrote:
> Is there a way to temporarily hide an object in Moray so its not part
> of the
> rendering and not on the screen?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You read my mind. I was just trying to figure out how/where to control an
objects rednerness. Does each object have such a checkbox and where exactly
is it hidden?
thanks
Mitch
"Alex Wolff" <ale### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3C40A82A.EF728E6C@gmx.de...
> hi mitchell!
> Dearmads visibility levels only changes the visibility of objects in
> moray. if you want objects not to be rendered, you must uncheck the
> render-checkbox of the objects.
> alex
>
>
> Mitchell Waite wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to temporarily hide an object in Moray so its not part
> > of the
> > rendering and not on the screen?
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Mitchell Waite, you recently wrote in moray.win:
> Does each object have such a checkbox and where exactly is it hidden?
It's on the Modify Tab of the object with the other flags (no_shadow,
etc). It's labelled "Export".
Note that export is only considered for top-level objects. Children
are always exported if parents are exported.
Also take a look at Layers for visibility stuff. Using Ctrl-1 toggles
layer 1 on and off.
- Lutz
email : lut### [at] stmuccom
Web : http://www.stmuc.com/moray
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > Does each object have such a checkbox and where exactly is it hidden?
> It's on the Modify Tab of the object with the other flags (no_shadow,
> etc). It's labelled "Export".
> Note that export is only considered for top-level objects. Children
> are always exported if parents are exported.
>
> Also take a look at Layers for visibility stuff. Using Ctrl-1 toggles
> layer 1 on and off.
that reminds me, how difficult would it be to give objects a variable detail
level?
something like, highest setting draws everything, medium draws only main
object and immediate child objects, almost lowest draws only the parent,
lowest gives you a bounding box?
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Rick [Kitty5], you recently wrote in moray.win:
> that reminds me, how difficult would it be to give objects a variable detail
> level?
The current architecture would make this a tad bit difficult.
Especially keeping the non-OpenGL viewport drawing....
- Lutz
email : lut### [at] stmuccom
Web : http://www.stmuc.com/moray
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The current architecture would make this a tad bit difficult.
> Especially keeping the non-OpenGL viewport drawing....
oh, and that's reminded me of another thing!
seeing as you have to generate all those triangles for the open gl viewport,
how about an export as mesh?
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Rick [Kitty5], you recently wrote in moray.win:
> seeing as you have to generate all those triangles for the open gl viewport,
> how about an export as mesh?
No comment.
- Lutz
:-)
- Lutz
email : lut### [at] stmuccom
Web : http://www.stmuc.com/moray
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Lutz Kretzschmar" <lut### [at] stmuccom> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3rr64uc90aiqj99rndq5p3qblt3ja35jsq@4ax.com...
> > seeing as you have to generate all those triangles for the open gl
viewport,
> > how about an export as mesh?
> No comment.
Could you eplain why 'No comment'? Isn't it a good idea?
-C-H-A-R-L-E-S-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:51:53 +0100, Charles Panke wrote...
>
> "Lutz Kretzschmar" <lut### [at] stmuccom> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:3rr64uc90aiqj99rndq5p3qblt3ja35jsq@4ax.com...
>
> > > seeing as you have to generate all those triangles for the open gl
> viewport,
> > > how about an export as mesh?
> > No comment.
> Could you eplain why 'No comment'? Isn't it a good idea?
I think it's more meant to imply that he could well be working on such a
feature and doesn't want to tip his hand.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS IS ALL COMPLETELY UNINFORMED SPCULATION ON MY PART. I HAVE *NO*
INSIDE INFO.
<grin>
Bye for now,
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
