Hay! - we should change the subject as there is at least 3 of us - our own
private group perhaps?
> Windows 2000 runs with 128MB, which is almost like a standard. My friend
> had it running nicely on 64MB. It's hard to find a system that comes with
> less than 128MB, because applications need the space!
I have it running with 256 here, it really makes a big difference and i
would not concider using less.
> And I would _not_ trust a company server to a 386 with 2MB of RAM. Maybe
a
> 486 ;-)
I would - those old 386 boxes will plug along (slowly) for years - and they
make great linux firewalls
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
Hi-Impact database driven web site design & e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|