 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sack Colin (the web developer) ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
> Sack Colin (the web developer) ;)
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
.... and the Forum provider, too...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 04:45:43 EST, "clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
>> Sack Colin (the web developer) ;)
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>
>.... and the Forum provider, too...
>
Same, same :)
Or close enough, I believe.
I bet Steve's having kittens :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
news:k73pl4l6rrmd508l7f1pub1mj6hmnvdqiq@4ax.com...
> Sack Colin (the web developer) ;)
Nah, he's valuable. :)
I'm not sure what's happened, but I wonder if it's anything to do
with the extra leap second?
~Steve~
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
news:web.495c90c772c9212c30acaf600@news.povray.org...
> .... and the Forum provider, too...
Yeah, that's the thing with free forums, you have no control.
Apparently, it's only the .co.uk domain that's down, and they just say
basically: "Hope it's back soon, sorry for the inconvenience." :o/
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
news:tp6pl4laaka2h1hv3jfcpqba99f76f39jf@4ax.com...
> I bet Steve's having kittens :)
LOL! :)
"DON'T PANIC CAP'N MAINWARING!!"
~Steve~
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:36:38 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dot com> wrote:
>
>"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
>news:k73pl4l6rrmd508l7f1pub1mj6hmnvdqiq@4ax.com...
>> Sack Colin (the web developer) ;)
>
> Nah, he's valuable. :)
>
> I'm not sure what's happened, but I wonder if it's anything to do
>with the extra leap second?
>
The well known *Year 2009* bug, I assume :)
And there was a slight "male-chicken up" in the animations, too. An extra
20-20-20 was added to both entries.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
news:of8pl4defnvgj7c0m9t55rvrc0cdtak0l8@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:36:38 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
>>news:k73pl4l6rrmd508l7f1pub1mj6hmnvdqiq@4ax.com...
>>> Sack Colin (the web developer) ;)
>>
>> Nah, he's valuable. :)
>>
>> I'm not sure what's happened, but I wonder if it's anything to do
>>with the extra leap second?
>>
>
> The well known *Year 2009* bug, I assume :)
Could be! :) No, I'm not sure about that extra second because I guess
our computers also took the extra second into account? If so, then surely
the web code would still work as intended?
>
> And there was a slight "male-chicken up" in the animations, too. An extra
> 20-20-20 was added to both entries.
No, don't forget that the same rule applies to both challenges where you
have to rate all other entries, and you both did.
~Steve~
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:16:48 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>> The well known *Year 2009* bug, I assume :)
>
> Could be! :) No, I'm not sure about that extra second because I guess
>our computers also took the extra second into account?
I doubt it unless your computer is set up to download the correct time from an
online site. (Computers are the most expensive, inaccurate clocks that I know
of.)
>If so, then surely
>the web code would still work as intended?
>
I was joking :)
>>
>> And there was a slight "male-chicken up" in the animations, too. An extra
>> 20-20-20 was added to both entries.
>
> No, don't forget that the same rule applies to both challenges where you
>have to rate all other entries, and you both did.
I think that there is a little bit of logic missing from Colin's code.
If individual voter does not vote for all entries {except their own (if any)}
then discount their votes. Should be the only rule here IM(Not So)HO.
I don't see the need for adding the 20-20-20 now every member can vote.
BTW Thanks for sending the reminder to vote for the animations, out.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
news:web.495c90c772c9212c30acaf600@news.povray.org...
> .... and the Forum provider, too...
Ok, the forum is up again now.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
