"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote in message 
news:46e52f7b$1@news.povray.org...

>  So, don't dispair.

   Thank you Thomas for your kind thoughts. I'm ok, it's just that generally 
I can handle what life throws at me, but then something rears its ugly head 
and I know I'm absolutely powerless to do anything about it. It's 
frustrating, and it makes me feel bad and sad at the same time, and I know 
those feelings won't go away.


> [end of sermon by Rev. Thomas; congregation bows head and weeps]

    Heh, well, see, it's quips like that, that keep me smiling.   :o)

     ~Steve~



>
> Thomas
>
>

Post a reply to this message

"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> Ok, an update for you.
>
>   I sent that email that I received yesterday to Colint this morning, and
> now he understands.
>
>   This is what he proposes:
>
>
>  a) We have Period 1 > 8 weeks
>     i) Images can be uploaded
>     ii) No voting is allowed
>
>  b) We have Period 2 > 1 week
>     i) No images can be uploaded
>     ii) Voting is allowed
>     iii) Voting is only allowed if all images/animations are voted on.
>
>
>     He can obviously do it this way, (just wish he'd grasped this in the
> first place though), but it will take a while, about 3 - 4 weeks. Now, where
> it says "We have Period 2 - 1 week", he says that this can be 2 weeks if you
> want.
>
>      So, overall, is this what we want, and do we want 1 week or 2 weeks
> voting and commenting time?
>
>       ~Steve~

Hey Steve,

sounds like a perfect fix to me!


plenty. More time, more votes I guess.

By the way, thanks for your patience and understanding. Looks like we have a
good thing going here which can only get better and better.

Hildur

Post a reply to this message

St. wrote:
>      So, overall, is this what we want, and do we want 1 week or 2 weeks 
> voting and commenting time?
> 

Two. I would sometimes miss the one week period due to my work schedule.

  -Shay

Post a reply to this message

> St. wrote:
> >      So, overall, is this what we want, and do we want 1 week or 2 weeks
> > voting and commenting time?
> >

No worries about not getting this sorted, I am persoanlly just thankful for
the work that you have put in so far to get the site to exist and to
operate. The new resolution with Colin sounds good, particularly the
everyone who votes having to vote for all the pictures. In terms of the
question of one or two weeks for voting and commenting then I would say two
just to so as to accomodate for as many people as possible to vote and
comment.

Thanks again steve,

Malcolm

Post a reply to this message

Steve -
Thanks for keeping us posted. (unlike some other web page, I don't think I
have to mention any names) but two weeks sounds good to me for the judging
period......remember this is all voluntarily done to make this web page
work. Why make it any harder to participate and judge then it should be.
It's suppose to be fun (scratch head)......, isn't it ?.....

Thanks again Steve.
Darin

And Markus,
If we don't get a chance to vote on this first round, I would have voted
higher marks for your animation than Johns. And, thank you for the brutally
honest marks, I did deserved them. Learning new techniques like particles
and other things in pov, I let my quality slip a lot. This will improve.
OOPS this is the stills area......sorry

Darin

Post a reply to this message

dbott wrote:
> It's suppose to be fun (scratch head)......, isn't it ?.....

Hey, you've got no idea how serious fun can be :)

If anyone's counting, i'd also suggest keeping the two-weeks 
schedule for voting.

Another thing i'm unsure of - can non-participants of a 
round (who are registered members of tc-rtc) vote, too? This 
would help to get a bigger number of samples to calculate 
the votes from, and having "independent" voters would also 
make sure that a "valid" vote could be calculated even if 
the "participants-only" vote for a round is incomplete due 
to whatever reasons, and thus invalid.

> And Markus,
> If we don't get a chance to vote on this first round, I would have voted
> higher marks for your animation than Johns. And, thank you for the brutally
> honest marks, I did deserved them. Learning new techniques like particles
> and other things in pov, I let my quality slip a lot. This will improve.
> OOPS this is the stills area......sorry

Well, i'm usually starting with "10", which stands for "OK" 
in my book, and add/subtract from there, so i didn't mean 
those marks to be brutal in any way!
Apart from that, i'm using quite a different toolset for my 
animations than most of the others do, so i guess my entries 
are kind of the "odd ones out" :)

An acquaintance of mine runs a freelance recording studio in 
his basement and he's offered to try and make a dubbed 
version. In german language, with bavarian accent. I'm a bit 
scared ... last time he offered to do audio stuff, it was 
for the "IRTC: Escape" topic years ago where i was just 
hoping for some music, but ended up with sound FX on top of 
that, which was ... weird, because the text remained as mute 
subtitles :S

I guess we should really move this over to irtc.animations 
by now... :)

-M

Post a reply to this message

"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:46e53eed@news.povray.org...
> Ok, an update for you.
>
>  I sent that email that I received yesterday to Colint this morning, and 
> now he understands.
>
>  This is what he proposes:
>
>
> a) We have Period 1 > 8 weeks
>    i) Images can be uploaded
>    ii) No voting is allowed
>
> b) We have Period 2 > 1 week
>    i) No images can be uploaded
>    ii) Voting is allowed
>    iii) Voting is only allowed if all images/animations are voted on.
>
>
>    He can obviously do it this way, (just wish he'd grasped this in the 
> first place though), but it will take a while, about 3 - 4 weeks. Now, 
> where it says "We have Period 2 - 1 week", he says that this can be 2 
> weeks if you want.
>
>     So, overall, is this what we want, and do we want 1 week or 2 weeks 
> voting and commenting time?
>

Yes, this looks good. I would suggest 2 weeks for period 2.
I would also be in favour for voting possibilities for members who have not 
submitted an image.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:46e53eed@news.povray.org...
> > Ok, an update for you.

>
> Yes, this looks good. I would suggest 2 weeks for period 2.
> I would also be in favour for voting possibilities for members who have not
> submitted an image.
>
> Thomas


idea that voting should not be restricted to the entrants. I still think
that the scores should be hidden until the end of the contest.

Steve:
Would it be possible for us to email you with our scores and for you, with
the help of your beautiful assistant, display the results.


Stephen

Post a reply to this message

2 weeks works for me.

Post a reply to this message

"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht 
news:web.46e644c53670edabc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
>
> I agree that a two week voting period would be suitable and like Thomas's
> idea that voting should not be restricted to the entrants. I still think
> that the scores should be hidden until the end of the contest.
>

Oh yes, I think this is important: Hide scores until end of contest!!

Thomas

Post a reply to this message