 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks like the next stills topic will be "Spectacular Landscapes",
according to the welcome.msg file on the IRTC ftp site.
Start pov'ing everyone!
Wolfox
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wolfox <wol### [at] hotmail com> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
3d73a64b@news.povray.org...
> Looks like the next stills topic will be "Spectacular Landscapes",
> according to the welcome.msg file on the IRTC ftp site.
And all the images and text files are ready to download.
> Start pov'ing everyone!
I have not stopped since.... (well I don't remember it clearly, maybe
IHBRTSL)
> Wolfox
Txemi Jendrix
tji### [at] txemijendrixcom
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I am wondering why it takes so long to see the change on the main home
page where most people browse to check.
Usualy people go to the main site for viewing, etc.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wolfox <wol### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3d73a64b@news.povray.org...
> Looks like the next stills topic will be "Spectacular Landscapes",
This will be a good topic. I have not entered the IRTC before, but I have
already started an entry for this round.
I hope Mick Hazelgrove gets in on this.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Your the first person I met who liked it. You wouldn't be a Bryce
user would you? :)
>This will be a good topic. I have not entered the IRTC before, but I have
>already started an entry for this round.
>
>I hope Mick Hazelgrove gets in on this.
>
> -Shay
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I still haven't made my mind about liking it or not... I'm waiting for
the full description of the theme on the official IRTC site to decide
that. :-)
Anyway, you have a point there, Bryce users will be right at home.
> Your the first person I met who liked it. You wouldn't be a Bryce
> user would you? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Wolfox" wrote:
> I still haven't made my mind about liking it or not... I'm waiting for
> the full description of the theme on the official IRTC site to decide
> that. :-)
May I suggest you not to read it?
Way too narrow-minded...
--
Jonathan.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Wolfox" <wol### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message news:3d73a64b@news.povray.org...
> Looks like the next stills topic will be "Spectacular Landscapes",
> according to the welcome.msg file on the IRTC ftp site.
>
> Start pov'ing everyone!
IRTC: "Any stunning view of natural origin."
Damn! I started my project the day after reading your post.
Now it doesn't fit with the description.
~Steve~
>
> Wolfox
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:3d77ce80@news.povray.org...
>
> IRTC: "Any stunning view of natural origin."
>
> Damn! I started my project the day after reading your post.
>
> Now it doesn't fit with the description.
>
Define "natural origin"? - or rather, "what the hell is an unnatural origin?"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote in message
news:3d78728e$1@news.povray.org...
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:3d77ce80@news.povray.org...
> Define "natural origin"? - or rather, "what the hell is an unnatural origin?"
Yes, I know, but the way they've presented the description, it reads to me
that they want a scene that's *known*, i.e., "The Grand Canyon, the Himalayas, the
Alps", etc...
I've started a SF scene that hopefully has a "Spectacular Landscape", but how
do I know if it's 'natural' or not?
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:3d7876d1@news.povray.org...
> Yes, I know, but the way they've presented the description, it reads to
me
> that they want a scene that's *known*, i.e., "The Grand Canyon, the Himalayas,
the
> Alps", etc...
>
Well, no offence to the irtc, but they aren't the arbiters of whether an image
is off-topic or not...
> I've started a SF scene that hopefully has a "Spectacular Landscape", but
how
> do I know if it's 'natural' or not?
read the accompanying text file? ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> "Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote in message
> news:3d78728e$1@news.povray.org...
>
>>"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:3d77ce80@news.povray.org...
>>
>
>>Define "natural origin"? - or rather, "what the hell is an unnatural origin?"
>>
>
> Yes, I know, but the way they've presented the description, it reads to me
> that they want a scene that's *known*, i.e., "The Grand Canyon, the Himalayas, the
> Alps", etc...
>
> I've started a SF scene that hopefully has a "Spectacular Landscape", but how
> do I know if it's 'natural' or not?
Exactly.
When only the title was available, I thought of a remote planet with a
big errupting volcanoe... It has to be on a remote planet, because of
the special lightning/feeling/... Probably not an original idea!
The way the text explains the title, I believe the landscape must be
somewhere on Earth! Moreover, it must be a real aerial landscape (hint:
what about Hawai islands, seen from the bottom of the sea, WiTHOUT any
water,
just keeping the traces of where the sea would be ? That would be
spectacular, that might be a landscape, but it does not seem to match
the text).
Also, did anybody think about 'paper -landscape' ? It would have been an
easy pun/word-play with the title, but it is obviously off-topic
according to the text (unless, it's a landscape photo of a spectacular
landscape... or any thing more recursive...)... advertisement in
landscape (instead of portrait) for a spectacle ?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> May I suggest you not to read it?
> Way too narrow-minded...
Too late. Already read it and to be honest I didn't like it.
I was thinking about a view of the "eggs" in the Matrix, with thousands
and thousands of red bulbs, each with a person inside, and Neo looking
at all that (like in the movie). But that is not of natural origin, so
I'm stuck with nothing.
Maybe in November... :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wolfox <wol### [at] hotmailcom> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
3d78b416$1@news.povray.org...
> I was thinking about a view of the "eggs" in the Matrix, with thousands
> and thousands of red bulbs, each with a person inside, and Neo looking
> at all that (like in the movie). But that is not of natural origin, so
My advice is DO IT.
That would be a spectacular landscape.
Txemi Jendrix
tji### [at] txemijendrixcom
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
3d78927a@news.povray.org...
> Well, no offence to the irtc, but they aren't the arbiters of whether an
image
> is off-topic or not...
I do agree with you. Each one of us decide if something is off-topic or not.
If the topic is as close as the others say, then why using pov?
Use Vue d'Esprit, Terragen, World Machine, Leveller, Vista Pro or Bryce (to
say some).
A lot of entrants will do so.
If I finally decide to enter, I won't make do the typical "Spectacular
Landscape"
Just my opinion.
Txemi Jendrix
tji### [at] txemijendrixcom
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wolfox <wol### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3d78b416$1@news.povray.org...
> But that is not of natural origin, so
> I'm stuck with nothing.
>
I think most concur that the topic is important, and the description not.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The Mad Hatter <the### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.3d76c775baaad2ecb7e712010@news.povray.org...
> Your the first person I met who liked it. You wouldn't be a Bryce
> user would you? :)
>
Not even sure what Bryce does, I only have PoV. The topic will have a bunch
of mountain and seaside entries, but to me it beats the Hell out of another
"perfume" topic.
Winter, Loneliness, Dreaming.
I would prefer that the topics were much more specific and therefore (to me)
more interesting, but the other voters obviously disagree strongly.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Txemi Jendrix" <tji### [at] euskalnetnet> wrote in message
news:3d78ed15@news.povray.org...
> Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
> 3d78927a@news.povray.org...
> > Well, no offence to the irtc, but they aren't the arbiters of whether an
> image
> > is off-topic or not...
>
> I do agree with you. Each one of us decide if something is off-topic or not.
Ok, that's fine. That's what I wanted to know. I'll keep my image and submit
it. ;)
>
> If the topic is as close as the others say, then why using pov?
> Use Vue d'Esprit, Terragen, World Machine, Leveller, Vista Pro or Bryce (to
> say some).
> A lot of entrants will do so.
NO, NO, NO! PoV! PoV! PoV! (Well, with me a little help from ac3d was needed
too...)
>
> If I finally decide to enter, I won't make do the typical "Spectacular
> Landscape"
Just enter Txemi, I always like your images.
>
> Just my opinion.
It would be a dull place without them! ;)
~Steve~
>
> Txemi Jendrix
> tji### [at] txemijendrixcom
> http://www.txemijendrix.com
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
When I first found out the ftp topic, I also started on mine,
unfortunately my project has been halted as when the irtc.org site had
finaly been updated days later, I found out the description does not allow
the theme I had intended. So back to the drawing board for me.
I may just stick with my original idea however. The IRTC is not all about
trying to get high votes. Well, ok that is not exactly true.. lol.
However, I may stick with my On topic and Off description project and just
try to make the best image I can, and despite I'll get burned by people who
dont think it applies, I will have a well made project nevertheless.
I am still trying to figure out how a topic that tends to cause most
runners I know so much grief, got voted #1. Perhaps this is an indication
that more people need to vote to get a true average, unless a flaw happened
during someones submission and a number of extra votes got slaped in.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 07 Sep 2002 04:34:45 -0400, The Mad Hatter quoth:
> When I first found out the ftp topic, I also started on mine,
> unfortunately my project has been halted as when the irtc.org site had
> finaly been updated days later, I found out the description does not
> allow the theme I had intended.
The description is not the topic. The description is just a suggested
interpretation of the topic. If your scene fits the topic, but not the
description, submit it anyway.
--
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"The Mad Hatter" <the### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.3d79ba24baaad2ec8d877f60@news.povray.org...
>
> However, I may stick with my On topic and Off description project and
just
> try to make the best image I can, and despite I'll get burned by people
who
> dont think it applies,
Yes, that is unfortunate. It may be true that the topic is not dependent on
the description, but I'm sure some voters won't feel that way.
> I am still trying to figure out how a topic that tends to cause most
> runners I know so much grief, got voted #1.
I think that the similarity of so many topics is another indication that
only a very small group of people are voting.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay wrote:
>
> I think that the similarity of so many topics is another indication that
> only a very small group of people are voting.
I do vote on the topic list. and I usually gives a 'poor' level to topic
which are far too closed. And it get a better level if I can think of
more than one 'typical' (openess to borderline interpretation is good too).
Perhaps I'm alone doing such, everybody else voting for its own entry ?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Wolfox" <wol### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3d78b416$1@news.povray.org...
> > May I suggest you not to read it?
> > Way too narrow-minded...
>
> Too late. Already read it and to be honest I didn't like it.
>
> I was thinking about a view of the "eggs" in the Matrix, with thousands
> and thousands of red bulbs, each with a person inside, and Neo looking
> at all that (like in the movie). But that is not of natural origin, so
> I'm stuck with nothing.
>
> Maybe in November... :-)
It "naturally" originated in your mind didn't it? Go for it.
--
light_source{0,1}#macro c(J,a)sphere{0,1pigment{rgb z}scale a translate J+O}
#end#macro B(R,V,O)c(0,4)intersection{c(V,R)difference{c(-z*4x+10)c(-z*4.1x+
10)c(0<7.5,45,5>)}}#end B(12,0z*25)B(8y*4<0,12,50>) // Batronyx ^"^
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like to use raytracing to create 'impossible' scenes and make them look as
if they were real. Ok, we can experiment a lot with perspective, texturing,
lightning and atmospheric effects. But why raytracing landscapes which are
already real (and even looking more natural on photos?). I'm missing some
fun in interpreting the theme and compositing a nice scenery this time.
As I read here, there are very good ideas in interpreting the theme and I'm
very sad I will never see those pictures. So have some courage and render
your ideas, that's what raytracing is for (and not winning any
competition)! And if you don't want to submit, post your images in the
newsgroup so everybody can see what really "spectacular landscapes" are
looking like!
I think the topic would be ok., but the description is "off-topic" to
raytracing!!!
render on
jo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
So, did any of you complete an entry based on your "unnatural" idea? If so,
I'm looking forward to seeing it.
-Shay
Wolfox <wol### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3d73a64b@news.povray.org...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay <sah### [at] simcopartscom> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
3dbdbeb2$1@news.povray.org...
> So, did any of you complete an entry based on your "unnatural" idea?
No, I'm not going to enter this round, maybe in the future (with other topic
;-)
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Txemi Jendrix" <tji### [at] euskalnetnet> wrote in message
news:3dbec4b8@news.povray.org...
> Shay <sah### [at] simcopartscom> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
> 3dbdbeb2$1@news.povray.org...
> > So, did any of you complete an entry based on your "unnatural" idea?
>
> No, I'm not going to enter this round, maybe in the future (with other topic
> ;-)
That's a shame. Judging from ftp://www.irtc.org there won't be many
entries. There's 33 at present. I hope there's a good surge tonight and tomorrow.
Mine isn't going to be finished because I know I can't do what I want to do
in time, but it looks ok(ish) so I'm sending it tonight.
~Steve~
>
> Txemi Jendrix
> http://www.txemijendrix.com
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Judging from ftp://www.irtc.org there won't be many
> entries. There's 33 at present. I hope there's a good surge tonight and
tomorrow.
Sure there will be. In past rounds it had be that way.
> Mine isn't going to be finished because I know I can't do what I
want to do
> in time, but it looks ok(ish) so I'm sending it tonight.
Good luck Steve, waiting to see your work.
Bye
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Txemi Jendrix" <tji### [at] euskalnetnet> wrote in message
news:3dbed2e5@news.povray.org...
> > Judging from ftp://www.irtc.org there won't be many
> > entries. There's 33 at present. I hope there's a good surge tonight and
> tomorrow.
>
> Sure there will be. In past rounds it had be that way.
Yes, I guessed this might be the case.
>
> > Mine isn't going to be finished because I know I can't do what I
> want to do
> > in time, but it looks ok(ish) so I'm sending it tonight.
>
> Good luck Steve, waiting to see your work.
Thank you. Heh... all I can say is that it's my most 'labour-intensive,
dream-creating' scene yet. ;)
~Steve~
> Bye
>
> Txemi Jendrix
> http://www.txemijendrix.com
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:3dbedb8a@news.povray.org...
>
Did you use your original idea, or come up with something more natural?
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." wrote:
>
> That's a shame. Judging from ftp://www.irtc.org there won't be many
> entries. There's 33 at present. I hope there's a good surge tonight and tomorrow.
>
I thought about the same but there are often quite a lot of submissions in
the last days, the lowest number of sumbissions in the last two years was
in the 'spirit of asia' round (64) and i think this round is likely to get
more. I submitted mine yesterday and am looking foreward to seeing the
other entries...
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 28 Oct. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3DBEE1ED.7BD91846@gmx.de...
> I submitted mine yesterday and am looking foreward to seeing the
> other entries...
>
> Christoph
>
You got one rendered in "only" 8 weeks?! 160x120 ?
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> You got one rendered in "only" 8 weeks?! 160x120 ?
Hehehe... Good joke.
Good luck Christoph.
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Shay" <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote in message news:3dbee08d$1@news.povray.org...
>
> St. <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:3dbedb8a@news.povray.org...
> >
>
> Did you use your original idea, or come up with something more natural?
Yes, I used my original idea. I started the image on the 2nd September and
the HF in the image was produced on the 3rd September. So to recap, it's a
'Spectacular Landscape' space scene. Oh well, I tried...
Just to add here: I've just sent it in and now I'm freaking out that I've
sent the wrong image!! I keep checking my 'Sent Folder' and it say's it's the
right image - phew, I think! ;) Does anyone else get this? <sweatin'loads>
~Steve~
>
> -Shay
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Txemi Jendrix" <tji### [at] euskalnetnet> wrote in message
news:3dbef44f@news.povray.org...
> > You got one rendered in "only" 8 weeks?! 160x120 ?
>
> Hehehe... Good joke.
Yeah, that's well worth a LOL! :o))
~Steve~
>
> Txemi Jendrix
> http://www.txemijendrix.com
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3DBEE1ED.7BD91846@gmx.de...
>
>
> "St." wrote:
> >
> > That's a shame. Judging from ftp://www.irtc.org there won't be many
> > entries. There's 33 at present. I hope there's a good surge tonight and
tomorrow.
> >
>
> I thought about the same but there are often quite a lot of submissions in
> the last days, the lowest number of sumbissions in the last two years was
> in the 'spirit of asia' round (64) and i think this round is likely to get
> more. I submitted mine yesterday and am looking foreward to seeing the
> other entries...
Yes, even though I didn't enter that one, I enjoyed it immensely - some great
art. I'm looking forward to this one too, so good luck Chris.
~Steve~
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
> HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
> Last updated 28 Oct. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:30:53 +0100, Christoph Hormann
<chr### [at] gmxde> wrote:
>I thought about the same but there are often quite a lot of submissions in
>the last days, the lowest number of sumbissions in the last two years was
>in the 'spirit of asia' round (64) and i think this round is likely to get
>more. I submitted mine yesterday and am looking foreward to seeing the
>other entries...
Anything to do with Iceland? :)
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hm, if you're thinking about that iced land image
from the last round (the one with the igloo), that's
not from Christoph...
And to answer any questions that may arise: No,
I didn't enter. I haven't got the time to start something
new at the moment, but want to finish old projects...
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
> Anything to do with Iceland? :)
>
>
> Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Nikias wrote:
>
> Hm, if you're thinking about that iced land image
> from the last round (the one with the igloo), that's
> not from Christoph...
I think Peter meant something different. :-)
But it isn't iceland, something quite different. You will be able to see
it in a few days...
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 28 Oct. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:3dbefcdb@news.povray.org...
>
>. So to recap, it's a 'Spectacular Landscape' space scene. Oh well, I
tried...
Hehehe. So's mine, and I think mine must be the entry I've spent the least
time
on ever. Well, at least it was fun
> Just to add here: I've just sent it in and now I'm freaking out that
I've
> sent the wrong image!! I keep checking my 'Sent Folder' and it say's it's
the
> right image - phew, I think! ;) Does anyone else get this?
<sweatin'loads>
>
Always. I FTP mine up and I always triple check the pic, the text file and
the
zip to make sure they're OK before sending
Gail
--
#macro G(H,S)disc{0z.4pigment{onion color_map{[0rgb<sin(H/pi)cos(S/pi)*(H<6)
cos(S/pi)*(H>6)>*18][.4rgb 0]}}translate<H-5S-3,9>}#end G(3,5)G(2,5.5)G(1,5)
G(.6,4)G(.5,3)G(.6,2)G(1,1)G(2,.5)G(3,.7)G(3.2,1.6)G(3.1,2.5)G(2.2,2.5)G(9,5
)G(8,5.5)G(7,5)G(7,4)G(7.7,3.3)G(8.3,2.7)G(9,2)G(9,1)G(8,.5)G(7,1)///GS
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gail Shaw" <gai### [at] mwebcoza> wrote in message
news:3dc1902a@news.povray.org...
>
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:3dbefcdb@news.povray.org...
> >
> >. So to recap, it's a 'Spectacular Landscape' space scene. Oh well, I
> tried...
>
> Hehehe. So's mine, and I think mine must be the entry I've spent the least
> time
> on ever. Well, at least it was fun
Oh! This was the one that I've spent *most* time on!! Again, good luck
Gail... Can't wait to see yours, you gonna have a look at mine? ;)
>
> > Just to add here: I've just sent it in and now I'm freaking out that
> I've
> > sent the wrong image!! I keep checking my 'Sent Folder' and it say's it's
> the
> > right image - phew, I think! ;) Does anyone else get this?
> <sweatin'loads>
> >
>
> Always. I FTP mine up and I always triple check the pic, the text file and
> the
> zip to make sure they're OK before sending
Yes, I did all that too, but still HAD to check it out to make sure. Finally, my
heart and head says it's ok.
Sweat over. Phew! ;o)
~Steve~
>
> Gail
> --
> #macro G(H,S)disc{0z.4pigment{onion color_map{[0rgb<sin(H/pi)cos(S/pi)*(H<6)
> cos(S/pi)*(H>6)>*18][.4rgb 0]}}translate<H-5S-3,9>}#end G(3,5)G(2,5.5)G(1,5)
> G(.6,4)G(.5,3)G(.6,2)G(1,1)G(2,.5)G(3,.7)G(3.2,1.6)G(3.1,2.5)G(2.2,2.5)G(9,5
> )G(8,5.5)G(7,5)G(7,4)G(7.7,3.3)G(8.3,2.7)G(9,2)G(9,1)G(8,.5)G(7,1)///GS
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
