Ken wrote:
> Lance Birch wrote:
> >
> > ooo did you check out Gilles'?  Wow... he always seems to come up with
> > something kewl... :)
>
> Pssst... Don't tell anyone but Gilles cheats. He has real artistic talent.

Ahh, so that's how he does it...

--
Lance.

http://come.to/the.zone

Post a reply to this message

Tom Melly wrote:
> ... or do a remarkable number of images seem wilfully off-topic this
round?
> (not to mention a noticeable lack of anti-aliasing).

OK, I looked through all the images, and I have to agree.  There are some
really strange images that don't seem to have any kind of contrast in them,
for example, ones like test.jpg.  One of them looks like it's been
completely post processed, one of them looks like it wasn't even rendered, a
lot of them have a lack of anti-aliasing as you mentioned, and there are
some that don't seem to fit the theme at all.

That said, there are some VERY nice renderings that really stand out and fit
the topic well.  There are also some very clever ideas that people have come
up with for contrasts, like the Escher'esque "hand holding silvered ball"
one, and of course Gilles' rendering which I'm just drooling over at the
moment.

Something about that image actually, it took me a while to notice the toilet
was being sidelit by the TV in the other room (probably because I was just
drooling over the image at first, hehe), which made me realise there's
actually a walk way there!  LOL, at first I'd thought they were completely
closed off rooms, not joined, and he was looking at her from an adjacent
apartment on the TV, then I realised they were joined, and he was looking at
her in the room, but they're in the same apartment...  LOL... that didn't
make any sense did it?

Annnnyywaayyy... *goes back to looking through the images*  I think I'm
going to have to read a lot of these text files carefully so that I actually
get the contrasts in some of these images.

--
Lance.

http://come.to/the.zone

Post a reply to this message

"Lance Birch" <-> wrote in message news:3a52bb5b@news.povray.org...
>
> OK, I looked through all the images, and I have to agree.  There are some
> really strange images that don't seem to have any kind of contrast in
them,
> for example, ones like test.jpg.  One of them looks like it's been
> completely post processed, one of them looks like it wasn't even rendered,
a
> lot of them have a lack of anti-aliasing as you mentioned, and there are
> some that don't seem to fit the theme at all.
>

The off-topic thing is weird - looking over my entries for previous irtc
entries, 3/7 of them could easily have been submitted for this round -
"contrasts" is a fairly inclusive topic as well as being a naturally
occuring theme in many compositions. As for the lack of AA, it isn't
reserved for the sub-standard images. A lot of pics that obviously required
a lot of work and effort are marred by this.

>
> Annnnyywaayyy... *goes back to looking through the images*  I think I'm
> going to have to read a lot of these text files carefully so that I
actually
> get the contrasts in some of these images.
>

Yes - although IMHO and except in specific circumstances, I don't think it
should be necessery to go to the text file to work out whether an image is
on-topic or not. Oh well.

Post a reply to this message

"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:3A5290C1.461275BC@pacbell.net...
>
> Pssst... Don't tell anyone but Gilles cheats. He has real artistic talent.
>

Is that some kind of commercial package or plugin?

Post a reply to this message

Tom Melly wrote:
> Yes - although IMHO and except in specific circumstances, I don't think it
> should be necessery to go to the text file to work out whether an image is
> on-topic or not. Oh well.

Well, that's what I thought too... I figured you should be able to see the
contrasts in the image anyway, but I thought perhaps there was something
obvious I'd missed in a few of them.

--
Lance.

http://come.to/the.zone

Post a reply to this message

Lance Birch <-> wrote:
: OK, I looked through all the images, and I have to agree.  There are some
: really strange images that don't seem to have any kind of contrast in them,
: for example, ones like test.jpg.  One of them looks like it's been
: completely post processed, one of them looks like it wasn't even rendered, a
: lot of them have a lack of anti-aliasing as you mentioned, and there are
: some that don't seem to fit the theme at all.

  Perhaps the contrast comes from the fact that the image has nothing to
do with the topic?

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

Warp wrote:
>   Perhaps the contrast comes from the fact that the image has nothing to
> do with the topic?

Hmm, hadn't thought of that...

--
Lance.

http://come.to/the.zone

Post a reply to this message

"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3a530591@news.povray.org...
>
>   Perhaps the contrast comes from the fact that the image has nothing to
> do with the topic?
>

This occured to me - also that the contrast is in the lack of AA ;)

Post a reply to this message

Lance Birch wrote:

> One of them looks like it's been
> completely post processed, one of them looks like it wasn't even rendered, a
> lot of them have a lack of anti-aliasing as you mentioned, and there are
> some that don't seem to fit the theme at all.

And one of them not only is a tiny photograph, but the text file says that it
has been done for the "Nature" round...

G.

Post a reply to this message

Gilles Tran wrote:
> And one of them not only is a tiny photograph, but the text file says that
it
> has been done for the "Nature" round...

LOL!

While you're here Gilles, congrats on the image, I really like it :)

--
Lance.

http://come.to/the.zone

Post a reply to this message