"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> As a side note, and something personal from me to you all, (this isn't
> aimed at you in particular Stephen). I totally agree that low scoring like
> that is an obvious attempt at skewing the final results and definitely not
> in keeping with the "fair play" side of things. (*My* observation). Can we
> keep it good and try to score fairly please? I know most of you do. :)
So, someone was trying to skew the results, eh? Bah! Baahh!!
Okay, we're watching you guys...
> I'm trying to do my best to get this right for everyone. I think it's a
> fun contest, and it certainly works ok - apart from some unnoticed bugs and
> behaviors that is. If you spot something, just mail me from the contacts
> page on the site.
I think this month was the first time that the voting app was really intuitive
and functioning the way I expected, good visual feedback on which images had
been voted on already, and love the expandable comment box, etc - really nice
job on that Steve! (I know how troublesome that sort of thing can become)
One bug I need to report is that it didn't put me 1st place this round - can
you look into that please ;? Stephen apparently has mathematical options where
I always win (woot!)...
"There is no spoon."
Post a reply to this message