"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message 
news:of8pl4defnvgj7c0m9t55rvrc0cdtak0l8@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:36:38 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
>>news:k73pl4l6rrmd508l7f1pub1mj6hmnvdqiq@4ax.com...
>>> Sack Colin (the web developer) ;)
>>
>>       Nah, he's valuable.  :)
>>
>>        I'm not sure what's happened, but I wonder if it's anything to do
>>with the extra leap second?
>>
>
> The well known *Year 2009* bug, I assume :)

    Could be! :)  No, I'm not sure about that extra second because I guess 
our computers also took the extra second into account? If so, then surely 
the web code would still work as intended?

>
> And there was a slight "male-chicken up" in the animations, too. An extra
> 20-20-20 was added to both entries.

  No, don't forget that the same rule applies to both challenges where you 
have to rate all other entries, and you both did.

     ~Steve~


> -- 
>
> Regards
>     Stephen

Post a reply to this message