Warp wrote:
>   Btw, when voting, could we please avoid the same problem as in the past,
> in other words, cross-contamination of categories?
> 
>   Just because an image is stunningly superb, a marvel of technical and
> artistic prowess, doesn't necessarily mean that the image is very original
> or represents the topic very well. Likewise an image can be of very crappy
> quality, but still have a wonderful idea related to the topic, so even if
> it's technically poor doesn't mean you should vote it down in all categories.
> Any other combination of categories applies too, of course.
> 
>   (Naturally I'm not talking here about any image in particular, or this
> round in particular, just in general.)
> 

This makes particular sense, because, if I presume correctly, the 
'overall' score is independent of the categorized scores. The 
categorized votes act only to decide category winners in lieu of the 
former nominations system.

Post a reply to this message