 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
... no, honestly. "Impostor!". With an exclamation mark. See FTP
transaction log quote below:
230- Stills Animations
230-
230-Current Topic Out of Place Impostor!
230-
230-Deadline February 28, 2004 April 15, 2004
And, in addition to the welcome message for FTP being updated,
the animation files seem also ready for downloading.
ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/anims/2005-01-15/
-Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You know, it's funny that I thought that was my idea, although the
description isn't what I would have written.
"Markus Altendorff" <maa### [at] anthrosphinx de> wrote in message
news:41eed0d6$1@news.povray.org...
> ... no, honestly. "Impostor!". With an exclamation mark. See FTP
> transaction log quote below:
Markus, will you be getting back into the saddle again? I've been honing
scene files for about 19 different characters, so I'm sure I can make one of
them an impostor of **somebody**.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Greg M. Johnson wrote:
> You know, it's funny that I thought that was my idea, although the
> description isn't what I would have written.
>
Oh yes, the description... After i read the "Impostor" line on
FTP, I had some immediate ideas for that (in the "dictionary"
[Langenscheidt's Edition] meaning which seems to go along the
lines of "cheat, deceive, betray"), but the description seemed a
bit narrow for most of them - and the "official" guideline seems
to be only about a person impersonating another one (which is the
same that my Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary offers).
[...]
>
> Markus, will you be getting back into the saddle again? I've been honing
> scene files for about 19 different characters, so I'm sure I can make one of
> them an impostor of **somebody**.
I sure hope i'll FINALLY again find the time to do something...
i've made pencil doodles and storybook sketches for all of the
last topics, but never found the time to really animate anything.
Learned a lot about spline mesh morphing, though...
The one i want to do for "Impostor!" seems to be on the
borderline of the topic (as defined in the guideline - it should
be OK when using Impostor). Oh well... worst thing could be a 0
for "interpretation of topic" :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Oh yes, the description... After i read the "Impostor" line on
> FTP, I had some immediate ideas for that (in the "dictionary"
> [Langenscheidt's Edition] meaning which seems to go along the
> lines of "cheat, deceive, betray"), but the description seemed a
> bit narrow for most of them - and the "official" guideline seems
> to be only about a person impersonating another one (which is the
> same that my Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary offers).
In that case, any Rusty animation not done by John VanSickle would be
on-topic. :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Did you see Rusty's cousin in one of mine??
I was also shooting for a cousin of Anthrospinx.
"Roberto Amorim" <wol### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:41f8efe4@news.povray.org...
>> Oh yes, the description... After i read the "Impostor" line on
>> FTP, I had some immediate ideas for that (in the "dictionary"
>> [Langenscheidt's Edition] meaning which seems to go along the
>> lines of "cheat, deceive, betray"), but the description seemed a
>> bit narrow for most of them - and the "official" guideline seems
>> to be only about a person impersonating another one (which is the
>> same that my Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary offers).
>
> In that case, any Rusty animation not done by John VanSickle would be
> on-topic. :-)
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
