|
 |
Stephen wrote:
> Markus Altendorff <maa### [at] panoramas de> wrote:
>
>>Markus Altendorff wrote:
>>
>>>Hi, me again, sorry, ...
>>>
>>
>>and one more thing...
>>
>>how big can/should the thumbnail be? The current ones are square in
>>shape and rather compact - i've gotten used to the 320x240 of the old
>>IRTC...
>>
>>-M
>
>
> I had the problem the other way. How to make the preview intelligible but
> obscuring the nudity. I think that I made it 200x150.
> in the stage to metal which I like but the render time has gone through the
> roof 20 mins + time for a memory leak, per frame.
20 minutes per frame? That's not long. I generally don't do anything
about render times until they're over a half hour. The memory leak is a
problem, though.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
 |