William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:

> First, Are you using v3.8 beta 2 for all your testing?
Probably.  Will confirm when I get home.

> Second, Did you take care when you did the differences with the box to
> not have coincident surfaces with the caps (if there) or that y height
> when the caps are not there?

Yeah, I have an E value set that I routinely use to avoid CS.
I had the caps present when I skipped adding/subtracting that, and then when I
fixed it, the caps went away.


> (*) I tried inverting all the on curve points and this does NOT work as
> I incorrectly remembered for some recent sor{} post - that must be a
> lathe{} only thing.

Right, because sor is an implicit interpolation, and lathe is a parametric
interpolation.

Thanks for checking on these.  Will compare notes when I get back later.

- BW

Post a reply to this message