hi,

"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> "jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > the link below is the result of my "fiddling" with his code,
> This looks great - hopefully I will get a chance to look that code over and see
> what else can be done with it!  :)

thank you.  will send an email, later today or tomorrow.


> > (at least one person finds it too long </grin>)
> I'm wondering if it were a slower speed, to yield a gentle, swirling motion - if
> a nice long (and/or looping) animation would just be some cool eye-candy for an
> inactive screen.

I too would have liked (much) slower "movement", the problem is the #frames
resulting; currently using 12th of degrees (Y rotation), wanted 16th or better
:-).  btw, "looping" would require changing the code, no loop/repeat as written.


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message