|
 |
"jr" <cre### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> agree. Bald Eagle argues[*] for including the scene code itself among the meta
> data, worth considering since it could be stored compressed and wouldn't take
> much additional space.
>
> [*] sorry, no ref.
Here's one of them:
https://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/message/%3Cweb.6076506a6a35d6561f9dae3025979125%40news.povray.org%3E/#%3
Cweb.6076506a6a35d6561f9dae3025979125%40news.povray.org%3E
To be 100% accurate, I argue for the OPTION or ABILITY to write the scene file
into the image.
Also useful would be to disable overwrite of the default output filename and
instead start writing Filename(1).png, Filename(2).png, etc.
Long time povvers know the dangers of rapid editing and rendering during scene
development.
- BW
Post a reply to this message
|
 |