Op 04/04/2024 om 18:12 schreef Alain Martel:
> 
> Essentially, a material is just a wrapper for a texture plus an 
> interior. So, if there is no interior, a material is effectively another 
> name for a texture.

Yes, that is what I have always assumed. So, if something (a simple 
macro) did work fine inside the original - material-based - granite 
macro, and it does not when the material wrap is taken away, this could 
mean that the original code worked fine... for the wrong reasons!

I have to think about this a bit more and explore deeper. I am not 
satisfied yet...

Anyway, if the code generated by Chris R works fine, there is no reason 
to avoid its use indeed, but it revealed something imho.

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message