Wasn't it MatrixFrog who wrote:
>Okay. Personally, I read in the documentation from day 1 that it's always
>recommended to run the clock from 0 to 1, then multiply by 100 or 360 or
>whatever in the scene itself. I've stuck with that, and it's what I'm used
>to.
>
>But you have other methods that work for you, I won't complain. It's your
>code, you write it how you want, right? I mean, why not? It might throw
>people who are looking at your code, but if you put in a comment or two
>about what you've done, it shouldn't be a problem.


Do you realise that you're replying to posts that are several years old?
 
In this case the original post was on 29 Dec 2000. The original authors
have probably stopped waiting for replies by now.

-- 
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure

Post a reply to this message