|
 |
"Shay" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
> > On 2026-01-13 18:29 (-4), Shay wrote:
> > > The only thing branching is giving you here is a "save point" in case you want
> > > to discard an entire feature. Git, like many things, is as hard as you want to
> > > make it.
> >
> > What if I don't want to make it hard, and it's hard anyway?
>
>
>
> use the parts *you* need, because you may never use the parts you imagine you
> *might* need, even if you *do* become advanced.
>
>
>
> able to code. Submit a request for typos in the README if you like. That is
> straightforward, done the same way by thousands, clearly documented online, and
> a way to use tools for the exact purpose they were designed.
Yes, Consider it a scaffolding over which you do not HAVE to walk... but COULD
once people responsible for it will lead you by the hand... one floor at a
time... meanwhile you are allowed to walk beneath remote admins, and Git does
provide you some safer space, no matter how intimidating its shadow is above
your head :-P Here is an example : Instead of branches, you could have just
used "stash" for now, which I find simpler because of its being local.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
