"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>
> I was thinking in terms of 'number' of photons rather
> than spacing:
>
> target 0.5-- the spacing between photons is reduced by half...whereas the number
> of photons is...either doubled or quadrupled(?)-- like spacing/2
> (or spacing/4 ?)
>
"...like spacing/2 or spacing/4" ???
Please ignore that bad analogy and arithmetic-- a result of 'over-thinking' :-[
Post a reply to this message
|