"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> ...
> much faster render, much lower gradient.  gave (again) value '100', the beta.2
> now reports "maximum gradient found was 12.207, ...".  nice.

fwiw, ran same with alpha.9945627 (over breakfast :-)), and got same gradient /
result.



regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message