hi,

"David Kraics" <bar### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> ...
> > ah.  please post a "minimal" scene showing /reproducing the problem.  thanks.
> ummm

:-)


> #version 3.5;

unsure but think '#for()' wasn't around then.  try a 3.7 / 3.8 executable ?

thanks for posting.  will have a look tonight.


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message